Clin2
NCT07731061Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two dental adhesives for front tooth cavities

Cervical Caries

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two new dental adhesives (bonding agents) used to fill cavities on the front teeth. The goal is to see which one works better and lasts longer, helping you keep a natural-looking, healthy smile.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
50 people
Ages
18 years to 55 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be between 18 and 55 years old.
  • You need to have tooth decay on the front (visible) surface of a front tooth, near the gum line.
  • The decay should be moderate — not too small, not too deep (the dentist will confirm this).
  • You must be in good general health (no severe gum disease, poor oral hygiene, or habits like teeth grinding).
  • Your tooth must be healthy (not cracked, broken, or already filled in that area, and the nerve must be alive).
  • You must be able to attend follow-up visits at 6 months and 12 months.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06946134Not yet recruiting
Comparing two dental fillings for cavities at the gum line

This study compares two types of tooth-colored filling materials used to repair cavities that form at the gum line on front teeth and premolars (the teeth just behind the canines). Both materials are designed to be easy for dentists to place and may help keep the area healthy. If you have a small to moderate cavity in this area, this trial could help determine which material works better over 18 months.

NCT06990945Not yet recruiting
New adhesive for cavity fillings over two years

This study tests a new dental adhesive (the material that bonds a filling to your tooth) to see if it helps cavities heal better and keeps fillings strong for two years, compared to the standard adhesive. It involves removing decay, filling the cavity, and checking the tooth over time.

Cairo
NCT06500546Not yet recruiting
How different adhesives affect dental treatment success

This study compares different dental adhesives used to fix tooth-colored fillings or restorations. It aims to find which one works best for long-lasting results.

NCT06457737Recruiting
Comparing two bonding methods for back tooth crowns

This study compares two different ways of bonding tooth-colored crowns on back teeth to see which one lasts better. If you need a back tooth restored, you may be able to join.

Irbid
NCT07289022Not yet recruiting
Comparing two dental filling materials for back teeth

This study compares two types of tooth-colored filling materials used to repair cavities in back teeth. The goal is to see which material works better and lasts longer, helping you keep your natural teeth healthy.

NCT07457749Recruiting· Early Phase 1
Comparing two tooth-colored fillings for back teeth cavities

This study tests a new self-hardening filling material against a light-activated bioactive filling for cavities between back teeth. The goal is to see which material works better and lasts longer.

Cairo, El Sherouk City

Hear when a new Cervical Caries trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.