Clin2
NCT07792551Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two ways to fit dental crowns on children's back teeth

Clinical Effect

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two methods for fitting stainless steel crowns on children's back teeth (molars) that have deep cavities. It aims to see which method works better and causes less discomfort.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
50 people
Ages
4 years to 8 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • Your child must be between 4 and 8 years old.
  • The tooth must have a cavity in the back part of the mouth (primary molar) that reaches deep into the tooth, but the nerve is still healthy.
  • Your child should not have any tooth pain or signs of infection like swelling or an abscess.
  • The tooth must be strong enough to hold a crown and not have too much damage from decay.
  • Your child must not be allergic to nickel (a metal used in the crowns), and should not have severe medical conditions or take medications that affect healing.
  • An X-ray must show that there is enough healthy dentin (the layer under enamel) between the cavity and the nerve.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07648654Recruiting
Hall Technique vs. Traditional Crowns for Decayed Baby Molars

This study compares two ways to treat decayed baby molars in children ages 5–8: the Hall Technique (a newer method) and traditional stainless-steel crowns. Researchers will measure which method works better, reduces anxiety, takes less time, and costs less.

Cairo
NCT07148401Not yet recruiting
Checking parent satisfaction with hall technique for children's cavities

This study tests a tooth-saving treatment for children's cavities in baby molars, using a special crown without needles or drills. It aims to see if parents are happy with this method.

Cairo
NCT07523776Not yet recruiting
Crown type comparison for treated baby molars

This study compares two types of crowns for baby molars that have had a pulpotomy (a procedure to remove infected pulp). The goal is to see which crown preserves the natural bite and space better.

Cairo, Giza/Egypt
NCT06767670Recruiting
Oral hygiene and germs in kids' mouths with two types of crowns

This study looks at how different types of ready-made crowns for baby molars affect the number of germs in a child's mouth and how oral hygiene plays a role. It might help dentists choose the best crown for kids.

Cairo, Nasr City
NCT07648979Not yet recruiting
3D-printed crowns vs metal crowns for baby teeth after nerve treatment

This study compares two types of crowns for baby molars that have had nerve treatment. One type is made with a 3D printer, and the other is the standard stainless steel crown. The goal is to see which crown works better for children's teeth.

Cairo
NCT07295574Not yet recruiting
Comparing two tooth caps for cavities in back baby teeth

This study compares two ways to fix a decayed back baby tooth in children aged 6 to 9: the Hall technique (a special type of crown) and stainless steel crowns. It checks how well each method restores biting and chewing.

Cairo, Giza Governorate

Hear when a new Clinical Effect trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.