Comparing two tooth caps for cavities in back baby teeth
Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.
This study compares two ways to fix a decayed back baby tooth in children aged 6 to 9: the Hall technique (a special type of crown) and stainless steel crowns. It checks how well each method restores biting and chewing.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- Your child is between 6 and 9 years old
- Your child is generally healthy and behaves well at the dentist
- Your child has a cavity in a back baby tooth that has not been fixed before
- The cavity is not too deep and the tooth is not causing pain or swelling
- Your child does not have jaw joint problems, teeth grinding, or other dental conditions
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two kinds of crowns used to cover back baby teeth (primary molars) in children. It aims to see which type stays on better and works best for kids.
This study looks at how well children recover their biting strength after getting a full crown on a baby molar. It is designed for kids who need a crown due to severe decay or after pulp treatment, to help understand the best ways to restore chewing function.
This study compares two ways to treat decayed baby molars in children ages 5–8: the Hall Technique (a newer method) and traditional stainless-steel crowns. Researchers will measure which method works better, reduces anxiety, takes less time, and costs less.
This study compares two methods for fitting stainless steel crowns on children's back teeth (molars) that have deep cavities. It aims to see which method works better and causes less discomfort.
This trial compares two ways to fix cavities in baby molars: the SMART Hall technique (a newer, less invasive method) and the traditional stainless steel crown. The goal is to see which works better for children aged 3 to 9.
This study compares two ways to place crowns on badly damaged permanent back teeth in children: the Hall technique, which doesn't require drilling or numbing, and the conventional method. It aims to see which approach works better for saving these teeth.
Hear when a new Carious Primary Molars trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.