Clin2
NCT07848776Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing trauma scores in Tunisian intensive care patients

Wounds and InjuriesMortalityCritical Illness

Part of Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This study looks back at adults who were in the intensive care unit in Tunisia because of a physical injury. It compares three scoring systems to see which one best predicts how well trauma patients do, which could help doctors improve care.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
1,000 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You must be 18 years of age or older.
  • You must have had a recent physical injury caused by an accident or violence (like a car crash, fall, or wound).
  • That injury must be the main reason you needed intensive care (ICU) right after the injury.
  • Your first ICU stay for this injury must have happened between January 2018 and December 2025.
  • You cannot have only burns, inhalation injuries, drowning, hanging, poisoning, or electrical/chemical injuries without a blunt or penetrating injury.
  • Your ICU admission must not have been for a medical condition where the injury was just a side note.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06121661Recruiting· Phase 1
Testing a trauma decision support system in the ER

This trial tests a computer system that helps doctors make decisions about trauma care. It looks at whether the system can improve care for patients with serious injuries in the Emergency Department.

Boston, Massachusetts
NCT07186777Recruiting
Comparing trauma scores in emergency care

This study compares three different scoring systems (EMTRAS, REMS, and GAP) used to quickly assess how severe a trauma injury is. The goal is to see which score works best at predicting outcomes, which could help doctors make faster decisions.

Baghdad
NCT06744985Recruiting
Comparing two scoring tools for trauma outcomes

This trial compares two scoring systems (RTS and MGAP) to see which one better predicts recovery, need for intensive care, or complications in people who arrive at the hospital within 6 hours of a traumatic injury.

Baghdad
NCT06732791Recruiting
Comparing two trauma scores for multiple injury patients

This study compares two simple scoring tools (MGAP and GAP) to see which better predicts outcomes in people with injuries to more than one body area. If you or a loved one has multiple traumatic injuries and arrives at the ER within 6 hours, this trial may help improve how doctors assess care.

Baghdad
NCT06711276Recruiting
Testing a new injury scoring system for blunt trauma patients

This study is testing how well a new scoring system (called NISS) measures the severity of injuries after a blunt trauma, like a car crash or fall. By using this score soon after you arrive, doctors hope to better predict your recovery and care needs.

Baghdad
NCT06709547Recruiting
Predicting survival after injury using trauma scores

Researchers want to see if certain injury scores can predict how well trauma patients will do. You may be asked to join this study if you come to the emergency room with an injury and agree to have your scores calculated.

Baghdad

Hear when a new Wounds and Injuries trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.