Clin2
NCT07875829Possibly a fitRecruiting

Recovery after colorectal surgery: Robots vs laparoscopic

Recovery Outcomes

This study compares how quickly and how well people recover after surgery to remove part of the colon or rectum, using either a robotic or a laparoscopic (keyhole) approach. Both are minimally invasive, but this trial aims to see if one leads to a smoother and faster recovery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
110 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years of age or older.
  • You are scheduled to have a planned (non-emergency) surgery to remove part of your colon or rectum, using either robotic or laparoscopic techniques.
  • Your overall health status is classified as ASA I, II, or III (i.e., you are generally healthy to have moderate disease that is well controlled).
  • You are able to give informed consent and answer questions about how you are feeling after surgery.
  • Your care follows an enhanced recovery program, which is a set of steps to help you heal faster.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07230262Recruiting
Robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for IBD patients

This study compares two types of minimally invasive surgery—robotic and laparoscopic—for people with inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's or ulcerative colitis) who need elective colon or rectal surgery. It aims to find out which approach might be better for recovery and outcomes.

Leuven, Vlaams Brabant
NCT07431892Recruiting
Pain after robotic vs. laparoscopic colon cancer surgery

This study compares pain levels after two types of minimally invasive colon cancer surgery: robotic and laparoscopic. It aims to see if one approach leads to less pain, which may help you recover more comfortably.

Madrid
NCT07029464Not yet recruiting
Robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer

This study compares the outcomes of two minimally invasive surgery techniques for right colon cancer: robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery. It aims to see which approach has better short-term and long-term results, which can help patients and doctors choose the best treatment.

NCT06729736Enrolling by invitation
Faster recovery after colorectal cancer surgery

This trial is testing a program called ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) to help patients recover faster after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. It aims to improve your recovery and reduce hospital stay.

Seoul, Seoul
NCT06067620Not yet recruiting
Robot vs camera surgery for right colon cancer

This trial compares two types of minimally invasive surgery to remove the right side of your colon for cancer: one done with the help of a robot, and the other done with a laparoscope (a long, thin tube with a camera). The goal is to see if one method leads to better recovery or outcomes.

NCT06844604Recruiting
Comparing carbon footprint of robotic, laparoscopic, and open colorectal surgery

This study measures the environmental impact (carbon footprint) of different surgical techniques for removing part of the colon or rectum. It aims to find which approach is more sustainable without compromising patient care.

Basel

Hear when a new Recovery Outcomes trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.