Clin2
NCT04200027Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing robotic versus TaTME surgery for rectal cancer

Rectal Cancer

Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of performing rectal cancer surgery: robotic surgery and a newer technique called TaTME (transanal total mesorectal excision). It aims to see which approach has better outcomes for patients. If you're having surgery for rectal cancer, this trial might help you get access to advanced surgical options.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
330 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You must have rectal cancer that is scheduled for TME surgery (surgery to remove the tumor and surrounding tissue) after discussion with your medical team.
  • You must be 18 years or older.
  • Your tumor must be located 12 cm or less from the anal verge (the opening of the rectum).
  • You must be able to safely receive pelvic radiation therapy if needed.
  • You must not be pregnant, breast-feeding, or planning to become pregnant during the trial.
  • You must have a life expectancy of at least 6 months.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT04098471Recruiting
Comparing two rectal cancer surgeries for T2 tumors

This trial compares two different surgery approaches for early-stage rectal cancer (T2N0M0) that is close to the anus. It tests whether a less invasive local removal followed by radiation works as well as more extensive surgery (total mesorectal excision).

Nanjing, Jiangsu
NCT06613399Not yet recruiting
Comparing two surgery methods for mid and lower rectal cancer

This trial compares a new surgery method that uses multiple technologies to remove rectal cancer more precisely versus the standard surgery. It is for people with middle or lower rectal cancer that hasn't spread, and it may help improve outcomes after surgery.

NCT05984485Recruiting· Phase 3
Surgery vs chemo before surgery for low-risk rectal cancer

This trial compares two approaches for low-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: going straight to surgery (TME) versus receiving chemotherapy before surgery. The goal is to see if upfront surgery works just as well, sparing patients from chemotherapy side effects.

Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality
NCT06314646Recruiting
Comparing two ways to reconnect the intestine after rectal cancer surgery

This study compares two ways of reconnecting the intestine after rectal cancer surgery. It looks at a newer method called TTSS against the standard double-stapled technique.

Rozzano, MI
NCT05964530Recruiting
Testing local removal versus radical surgery for rectal cancer

This trial looks at whether removing the rectal tumor locally (through the anus) can work as well as a more extensive operation after scans show no remaining cancer. It may help some people avoid bigger surgery if the cancer truly appears gone after treatment.

Taipei
NCT06043999Recruiting
Chemotherapy vs. surgery for high-risk rectal cancer after local removal

This trial compares standard chemotherapy to more extensive surgery (total mesorectal excision) for patients whose initial local surgery showed high-risk features like poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, or larger tumor size. It aims to find the best treatment to prevent cancer from coming back.

Guangzhou, Guangdong

Hear when a new Rectal Cancer trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.