Clin2
NCT06314646Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing two ways to reconnect the intestine after rectal cancer surgery

Rectal CancerSurgery

Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of reconnecting the intestine after rectal cancer surgery. It looks at a newer method called TTSS against the standard double-stapled technique.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
472 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have been diagnosed with rectal cancer and are scheduled for surgery to remove the rectum.
  • Your surgeon plans to reconnect the remaining intestine to the anus (sphincter-saving surgery), possibly with a temporary colostomy bag.
  • You are not having a surgery where the surgeon stitches the colon and anus together by hand.
  • You are not having a surgery that removes the anus and creates a permanent colostomy (abdominoperineal resection)
  • You do not have or have never had another invasive cancer in the pelvic area (like bladder, prostate, or uterine cancer).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT04098471Recruiting
Comparing two rectal cancer surgeries for T2 tumors

This trial compares two different surgery approaches for early-stage rectal cancer (T2N0M0) that is close to the anus. It tests whether a less invasive local removal followed by radiation works as well as more extensive surgery (total mesorectal excision).

Nanjing, Jiangsu
NCT07369531Recruiting
Stoma-free survival after new anal-sparing surgery for low rectal cancer

This study compares a two-stage surgical technique (Turnbull-Cutait pull-through) to standard surgery for people with low rectal cancer. The goal is to see which approach helps more patients avoid a permanent stoma (bag) after surgery.

Changchun, Jilin
NCT02966483Recruiting
Transanal or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer

This trial compares two surgical approaches to remove rectal cancer tissue while aiming to preserve cure chances. It may help you see which approach fits your tumor location and health situation best.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT07376980Enrolling by invitation
Modified single-stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer surgery

This trial is testing a modified surgical technique (single-stapled anastomosis) for removing part of the rectum in people with rectal cancer. The goal is to see if this approach can improve recovery or outcomes while using minimally invasive methods like laparoscopic or robotic surgery.

Suwon, Gyeonggi-do
NCT07209787Recruiting· Phase 4
Reinforced vs. standard connection for rectal cancer surgery

This trial tests whether a special reinforcement patch (made from pig tissue) can reduce the risk of leaks when the rectum is reconnected after rectal cancer surgery. It compares the reinforced connection to the standard method.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT06613399Not yet recruiting
New surgery vs standard surgery for mid and lower rectal cancer

This trial compares a newer surgical approach that uses multiple imaging techniques to a standard surgery for removing rectal cancer. It aims to see if the new method leads to better outcomes for patients with middle or lower rectal cancer.

Hear when a new Rectal Cancer trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.