Clin2
NCT04513808Possibly a fitRecruiting

Compare IV versus inhaled anesthesia for esophageal surgery

Esophageal Cancer

Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.

This trial tests whether using IV anesthesia (given through a vein) or inhaled anesthesia helps people live longer without their esophageal cancer coming back after surgery. You’d be randomly assigned to one anesthesia type as part of potentially curative surgery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,614 people
Ages
18 years to 90 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have primary esophageal cancer that hasn’t spread beyond the esophagus (stage 1–3 believed).
  • You are scheduled for surgery aimed at curing your esophageal cancer.
  • You are willing to be randomly assigned to IV anesthesia or inhaled anesthesia.
  • You have not had prior esophageal cancer surgery (except diagnostic biopsies).
  • Your age is between 18 and 85.
  • You can safely receive either propofol (IV) or sevoflurane (inhaled), with no listed allergy or contraindication.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05547529Recruiting· Phase 3
Chemo and radiation before surgery versus chemo alone for esophageal cancer

This trial studies whether adding radiation to chemotherapy before surgery works better for people with operable (resectable) squamous cell esophageal cancer. It aims to improve outcomes by comparing two different treatment plans before the operation.

Moscow
NCT07434739Recruiting
Pain relief after minimally invasive esophagectomy: catheter vs. epidural

This study compares two ways to manage pain after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a paravertebral catheter (a small tube near the spine) versus epidural analgesia (a tube in the back). The goal is to see which method provides better pain relief with fewer side effects.

Lille
NCT05105945Not yet recruiting
Single-port vs laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer

This study compares two minimally invasive surgical techniques for removing esophageal cancer. It aims to see if the single-port approach is as effective as the standard laparoscopic method, potentially leading to less pain and faster recovery.

Zhuhai, Guangdong
NCT07104838Not yet recruiting
Breathing tube versus no tube for esophageal cancer surgery

This study looks at whether giving anesthesia without a breathing tube (non-intubated) is as safe and effective as using a breathing tube during minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery. If you're having this surgery, this trial compares two ways to keep you comfortable and breathing during the operation.

NCT05991453Recruiting
Recovery after IV vs. inhaled anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery

This trial compares recovery after two types of general anesthesia: one given through an IV (propofol) and one inhaled as a gas. It aims to see which approach leads to a smoother recovery for people having non-cardiac surgery.

Little Rock, Arkansas
NCT05663242Recruiting· Phase 4
Comparing anesthetics for outcomes after lung tumor surgery

This study looks at whether using different anesthesia drugs during planned lung tumor surgery affects recovery and longer-term outcomes. It also aims to understand why the anesthesia choice might make a difference.

Kaohsiung City

Hear when a new Esophageal Cancer trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.