Clin2
NCT04922229Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing treatments for badly inflamed tooth nerve pain

Irreversible Pulpitis

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares two dental treatments for “irreversible pulpitis,” a type of tooth-nerve pain that doesn’t settle on its own. It may help you by testing which approach works best for stopping symptoms and keeping the tooth stable.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
138 people
Ages
12 years to 99 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have a painful first or second permanent molar (upper or lower) that can be treated without a crown
  • Your tooth has symptoms of irreversible pulpitis, like spontaneous pain and pain after cold that lasts more than 30 seconds
  • Your tooth has normal-looking root tissue on X-ray and tests that respond to cold and an electric nerve test
  • You’re at least 12 years old for first molars, or at least 16 years old for second molars
  • There is no dead nerve or infection around the root (no pulp necrosis or apical periodontitis), and no swelling or draining “sinus tract”

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06904781Recruiting
Pulp treatment for baby teeth with severe toothache

This study compares two ways to treat severe tooth decay in baby molars: removing only the top part of the nerve (pulpotomy) versus removing all of the nerve (pulpectomy). It aims to see which method works better for saving the tooth and relieving pain.

Irbid
NCT07403578Not yet recruiting
Cryotherapy for toothache relief

This trial tests if using cold (cryotherapy) before a root canal can make the numbing shot work better and reduce pain for people with a specific type of severe toothache called irreversible pulpitis.

NCT05964933Enrolling by invitation
Pulpotomy vs root canal for painful nerve inflammation

This trial compares two treatments for a tooth nerve that is very inflamed and causing lingering pain: a pulpotomy versus a full root canal. It may help you choose the approach that best relieves symptoms and supports healing for the right kind of tooth.

Singapore
NCT06922578Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for baby tooth nerve pain

This trial compares two treatments for baby molars with severe nerve pain (irreversible pulpitis). One option removes only the infected nerve tissue in the crown, while the other removes all the nerve tissue. Both use special materials to seal the tooth.

NCT06447753Recruiting
Comparing two treatments for tooth pain in back molars

This study compares two ways to treat a deep cavity in a back molar that has a moderately inflamed nerve. If you have a painful deep cavity, this trial will test if a partial or complete nerve treatment works better to save your tooth.

Rohtak, Haryana
NCT07046533Not yet recruiting
Pulpotomy vs root canal for painful molars

This trial compares two treatments for a painful tooth condition called irreversible pulpitis. If you have a first permanent molar that hurts spontaneously or stays painful after hot/cold drinks, this study may help decide if a less invasive treatment (pulpotomy) works as well as standard root canal therapy.

Hear when a new Irreversible Pulpitis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.