Clin2
NCT07375576Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing partial nerve removal to root canal for severe tooth pain

Post-operative PainPulpitis - IrreversibleSuccess Rate

Part of Pain clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to treat severe tooth pain from advanced decay: a partial nerve removal (pulpotomy) versus a full root canal treatment. It aims to find which approach works better for saving the tooth.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
99 people
Ages
18 years to 45 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 15 and 45 years old and in good general health (no systemic diseases).
  • You have a deep cavity in a lower jaw premolar or molar (first or second).
  • The tooth has signs of severe, persistent pain from pulpitis (nerve inflammation that cannot be reversed).
  • The tooth is restorable and has no cracks, fractures, or infection at the root tip.
  • Your gums around that tooth are healthy (pockets no deeper than 3 mm).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05964933Enrolling by invitation
Pulpotomy vs root canal for painful nerve inflammation

This trial compares two treatments for a tooth nerve that is very inflamed and causing lingering pain: a pulpotomy versus a full root canal. It may help you choose the approach that best relieves symptoms and supports healing for the right kind of tooth.

Singapore
NCT06922578Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for baby tooth nerve pain

This trial compares two treatments for baby molars with severe nerve pain (irreversible pulpitis). One option removes only the infected nerve tissue in the crown, while the other removes all the nerve tissue. Both use special materials to seal the tooth.

NCT06929247Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for infected baby molars

This study compares two treatments for a deeply infected baby molar tooth in children ages 4–9. One treatment removes only the top part of the nerve (pulpotomy) with a special material, while the other removes the entire nerve (pulpectomy). The goal is to see which works better to save the tooth and prevent pain.

NCT07230717Not yet recruiting
Comparing Treatments for Baby Molars With Nerve Damage

This study compares two treatments for baby molars with a damaged or dead nerve: a partial nerve removal (pulpotomy) versus a complete nerve removal (pulpectomy). The goal is to see which works better and helps save the tooth.

NCT07123025Recruiting
Partial pulp treatment for painful tooth decay

This study tests if removing only the top part of the damaged tooth nerve can save a deeply decayed molar. It is for people with moderate to severe toothache that doesn't stop, especially when lying down.

Rohtak, Haryana
NCT06447753Recruiting
Comparing two treatments for tooth pain in back molars

This study compares two ways to treat a deep cavity in a back molar that has a moderately inflamed nerve. If you have a painful deep cavity, this trial will test if a partial or complete nerve treatment works better to save your tooth.

Rohtak, Haryana

Hear when a new Post Operative Pain trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.