Clin2
NCT05701046Possibly a fitRecruiting

Front vs back surgery for a slipped lower-back vertebra

Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Pain clinical trials.

This trial compares two surgical approaches—operating from the front/side versus from the back—for a specific type of lower-back slip called lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. You may be eligible if you need surgery at a single level and have not had prior spine surgery, and if your back condition matches their exact limits.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
489 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You are age 18 or older (or the age of majority in your province).
  • You have a single-level lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis and you need surgery for it.
  • Your surgery plan must fit one group: either front/side (an anterior or oblique approach) or back-only (posterior approach).
  • You can speak and understand English or French well enough for study visits.
  • You have not had any previous spinal surgery.
  • You do not have certain extra problems above or below the main level (like degenerative slipping or a pars defect) that would change the pattern.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05538416Recruiting
Back surgery approach trial for mild slip and leg pain

This trial compares a newer, “cortical bone trajectory” method with more traditional open surgery and a minimally invasive approach for treating certain low-back slips. It looks at short-term outcomes to see which approach helps patients recover better and relieve leg symptoms.

Groningen
NCT07289737Recruiting
Comparing two spine surgeries for a slipped backbone

This study compares two types of spine surgery for a common condition where a lower back bone slips forward. It aims to see which surgery works better to relieve pain and improve function.

Yiwu, Zhejiang
NCT06749314Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of back surgery for a common spine condition

This study compares two minimally invasive surgical methods for treating a type of lower back problem where one spinal bone slips forward over another. The goal is to see which approach gives better pain relief and function, helping you choose the best option.

Chon Buri
NCT06169488Recruiting
Comparing fusion surgery to rehab for chronic low back pain

This trial compares two approaches for chronic low back pain caused by worn discs: lumbar fusion surgery versus a structured multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. It aims to see which treatment provides better long-term relief and function.

Drammen
NCT06709391Recruiting
Spinal fusion vs. no surgery for chronic low back pain

This trial tests whether a spinal fusion surgery is better than staying with non-surgical treatments for people with long-term, severe low back pain from worn-out discs in the lower spine. It aims to find out which approach offers better pain relief and quality of life.

Gothenburg
NCT05769114Recruiting
Surgery vs non-surgery for a specific back fracture

This study compares surgery and non-surgical care for an acute burst fracture in the middle-to-lower back. The goal is to see which approach works better for healing and recovery.

Bern

Hear when a new Isthmic Spondylolisthesis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.