Clin2
NCT06749314Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two types of back surgery for a common spine condition

Degenerative Lumbar SpondylolisthesisLumbar Degenerative DiseaseLumbar Spinal Stenosis

Part of Bones, joints & muscles clinical trials.

This study compares two minimally invasive surgical methods for treating a type of lower back problem where one spinal bone slips forward over another. The goal is to see which approach gives better pain relief and function, helping you choose the best option.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
66 people
Ages
40 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have a single-level spine condition called lumbar spondylolisthesis, where one bone in your lower back slips forward, but only at a mild to moderate grade (grade I or II).
  • You have tried non-surgical treatments like physical therapy, medication, or injections for at least 3 months without enough relief.
  • Your imaging shows the slipped bone is stable and not moving excessively when you bend or stretch.
  • You are willing to come back for check-ups for at least one year after the surgery.
  • You agree to participate voluntarily and have no prior back surgery or other serious spine problems like infection or fracture.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07281625Recruiting· Early Phase 1
Comparing two types of back surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that puts pressure on nerves). One group will get standard decompression (relieving pressure), the other group will get that plus screws and rods to stabilize the spine. The goal is to see which leads to better outcomes.

Lahore, Punjab Province
NCT06719037Recruiting
Comparing two spine surgeries for lower back narrowing

This study compares two different surgical techniques – one using a small camera (endoscopic discectomy) and the other a traditional open approach (microdiscectomy) – to treat narrowing in the lower spine. It helps find which method may be better for relieving pain and improving function.

Jinan, Shandong
NCT07026305Recruiting
Comparing surgical approaches for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study is comparing two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (narrowing of the lower spine). It aims to see if a less invasive surgery works as well as a more extensive procedure, which may help patients recover faster.

Madrid
NCT06394089Recruiting
Spine surgery study for stenosis with mild slippage

This study tests a minimally invasive spine surgery (unilateral biportal endoscopy) to see if it works well for people with lumbar spinal stenosis who also have a mild vertebra slippage (spondylolisthesis). The goal is to improve leg symptoms like pain or numbness when walking.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT07588555Recruiting
Two surgical approaches for lumbar spine narrowing

This trial compares two slightly different surgical techniques for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal that causes leg pain). Both procedures fuse one level of your spine to relieve pain, but use slightly different approaches through the side of the spine.

Guangzhou, Guangdong
NCT07127380Recruiting
Comparing two types of spine surgery for disc-related low back pain

This study compares two different surgery methods (Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF) for treating low back pain caused by worn-out discs in the lower back. The goal is to see which one offers better recovery, fewer complications, and lower costs.

Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship

Hear when a new Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.