Clin2
NCT05906134Possibly a fitRecruiting

Pain control plan after minimally invasive esophagus surgery

Postoperative Pain, AcutePostoperative Complications

Part of Pain clinical trials.

This trial tests a pain-control method (using an epidural/nerve pain-block through the back, called neuraxial anesthesia) for people having minimally invasive esophagus removal surgery. It may help reduce pain after surgery and improve comfort during recovery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
Phase 1/Phase 2
Enrollment
30 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • Be an adult (at least 18 years old) having an esophagectomy at Swedish Medical Center–First Hill.
  • Your planned surgery uses a minimally invasive chest approach like R VATS 3-hole or Ivor Lewis R VATS.
  • Be able to understand the study and sign consent (or have consent capacity).
  • Have no other extra surgeries planned at the same time as the esophagectomy.
  • Not have had previous surgery in the chest (thoracic surgery).
  • You should not already take daily strong pain medicines (narcotics) for chronic pain.
  • Be able to speak and read English enough to participate.
  • No reason your care team cannot safely place an epidural/neuraxial pain catheter (for example, certain blood thinners, expected full-dose blood thinners after surgery, a spinal cord stimulator, or spine/area anatomy that prevents placement).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07436806Recruiting
Comparing nerve blocks for pain after chest surgery

This trial compares two types of nerve blocks to see which one better prevents long-term pain after video-assisted chest surgery. It may help find a way to reduce chronic pain after your procedure.

Istanbul, Bagcilar
NCT07434739Not yet recruiting
Pain relief after minimally invasive esophagectomy: catheter vs. epidural

This study compares two ways to manage pain after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a paravertebral catheter (a small tube near the spine) versus epidural analgesia (a tube in the back). The goal is to see which method provides better pain relief with fewer side effects.

Lille
NCT05504265Recruiting· Phase 2/Phase 3
Pain control methods during minimally invasive esophagus surgery

This study compares different ways to control pain around the time of minimally invasive esophagus surgery. It may help find a method that controls pain better and improves recovery after surgery.

Beijing
NCT07535697Recruiting
Pain relief methods after lung surgery: two approaches compared

This study compares two ways to reduce pain after minimally invasive lung surgery (VATS). Researchers test whether numbing the chest wall with ultrasound guidance works as well as numbing nerves seen during surgery to help you recover more comfortably.

Offenbach, Hesse
NCT07578545Recruiting
Pain management after minimally invasive chest surgery

This study tests whether combining a specific type of chest surgery (using small cameras) with numbing injections around nerves reduces pain and the need for strong pain medications after surgery. Researchers want to see if this approach helps patients recover better with less opioid use.

Antalya, Muratpaşa
NCT06704698Recruiting
Pain relief after esophageal surgery: comparing two nerve blocks

This trial compares two types of nerve blocks (paravertebral and epidural) to see which provides better pain relief after esophagectomy. The goal is to find the safest and most effective way to manage pain for patients undergoing this surgery.

Hangzhou, Zhejiang

Hear when a new Postoperative Pain, Acute trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.