Clin2
NCT06663553Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two types of less invasive hysterectomy for enlarged uterus

Enlarged UterusAdenomyosisUterine Fibroids (UF)

Part of Cancer, Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two newer, less invasive surgical methods for removing an enlarged uterus (total hysterectomy). The goal is to see which approach works better for women with a uterus weighing at least 280 grams (about the size of a 3-month pregnancy). Both techniques are performed through small incisions, avoiding open surgery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
210 people
Ages
18 years to 70 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are a woman between the ages of 18 and 70
  • You need a total hysterectomy due to an enlarged uterus (uterus weight at least 280 grams, similar to a 3-month pregnancy)
  • You are willing to be randomly assigned to either of the two surgical methods
  • You are willing to sign a consent form agreeing to participate
  • You have not had two or more pelvic surgeries or a history of severe pelvic scar tissue
  • Your body mass index (BMI) is 30 or less

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06802198Not yet recruiting
Comparing partial vs full hysterectomy outcomes

This trial compares two types of hysterectomy (removing the uterus) to see which has better long-term results. It may help if you are considering surgery for non-cancer reasons.

Rome, Lazio
NCT06692335Recruiting
Comparing HIFU and surgery for uterine fibroids

This trial compares two treatments for painful or heavy menstrual bleeding caused by uterine fibroids: high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and myomectomy (surgery to remove fibroids). It may help you decide which option fits your needs.

Hong Kong
NCT04886791Recruiting
Compare two ways to remove the uterus through the vagina

This study compares a newer “vaginal NOTES” approach with the standard way of removing the uterus through the vagina. It may help find which method is safer or easier for people who need a hysterectomy for non-cancer (benign) reasons.

Eindhoven, North Brabant
NCT07496814Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of hysterectomy for non-cancer conditions

This study compares two methods of hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) for benign (non-cancer) conditions. It aims to see if the less invasive laparoscopic approach is as effective as traditional abdominal surgery in settings with limited resources.

NCT06776718Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of hysterectomy for non-cancer conditions

This trial compares two ways to remove the uterus through the vagina, using either special instruments (VNOTES) or the traditional approach (vaginal hysterectomy). It is for women who need this surgery for non-cancer reasons.

Istanbul
NCT07226375Recruiting
Trial comparing two hysterectomy methods for large uteri

This study tests a new device that cuts and removes tissue through a tiny camera during laparoscopic hysterectomy. It may help women with very large uteri have a less invasive surgery compared to the standard cold scalpel method.

Izmir

Hear when a new Adenomyosis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.