Clin2
NCT07601971Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two ways to remove the uterus by keyhole surgery

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This trial compares two keyhole (laparoscopic) surgeries for removing the uterus in women with non-cancerous conditions like fibroids or heavy bleeding. One method blocks the blood supply to the uterus first, which may reduce bleeding during surgery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
44 people
Ages
35 years to 55 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are over 35 years old
  • You have a non-cancerous condition like fibroids, thickened womb lining, or heavy bleeding that hasn't improved with medicine
  • Your uterus is smaller than a 20-week pregnancy
  • You are generally healthy (classified as ASA 1, 2, or 3 by your doctor)

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07496814Not yet recruiting
Comparing two hysterectomy methods for non-cancer conditions

This study compares two ways to remove the uterus (hysterectomy) for non-cancerous conditions: one using small cuts and a camera (laparoscopic), and the other using a larger belly cut (abdominal). It aims to see which method works better in settings with limited resources.

NCT06663553Not yet recruiting
Comparing two keyhole surgeries for enlarged uterus

This trial compares two minimally invasive surgery methods to remove an enlarged uterus. It aims to see which approach has better results for women needing a hysterectomy due to an enlarged uterus.

Chengdu, Sichuan
NCT06802198Not yet recruiting
Comparing two hysterectomy approaches for long-term results

This study compares two types of hysterectomy (surgery to remove the uterus) to see which one has better long-term results. You will be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical approaches, and the researchers will follow your health over time to learn which method is safer and more effective.

Rome, Lazio
NCT04886791Recruiting
Compare two ways to remove the uterus through the vagina

This study compares a newer “vaginal NOTES” approach with the standard way of removing the uterus through the vagina. It may help find which method is safer or easier for people who need a hysterectomy for non-cancer (benign) reasons.

Eindhoven, North Brabant
NCT07774871Not yet recruiting
Routine versus selective ureter protection during hysterectomy

This study compares two approaches to protecting the ureter (the tube that carries urine from the kidney to the bladder) during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Some patients will have the ureter freed from nearby tissue (routine ureterolysis), while others will have it only if the surgeon thinks it's needed. The goal is to find out which method is safer and works better.

Cairo, Cairo Governorate
NCT06867614Recruiting
Belly-scope vs. vaginal closure after uterus removal

This study compares two ways to close the top of the vagina after a laparoscopic hysterectomy (keyhole removal of the uterus) – one done through small belly incisions and one through the vagina itself. It looks at which method works better for healing and recovery.

Cairo

Hear when a new Laparoscopic Hysterectomy trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.