Clin2
NCT06720311Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Treatment choices for medium-sized kidney stones

Renal Stones

Part of Kidney & urinary, Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study looks at ways to manage medium-sized kidney stones (10–20 mm). It likely compares shock wave lithotripsy (sound waves to break up stones) with other options to find the best treatment for stones this size.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
90 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years old or older.
  • You have one kidney stone that is between 10 and 20 millimeters (about the size of a pea to a small grape).
  • You have not had any prior surgery or procedure on the same kidney to treat stones or explore the urinary tract.
  • You do not have a JJ stent (a tube placed to help urine drain) in the same kidney.
  • You do not have any medical condition that would make it unsafe for you to have shock wave lithotripsy.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07322471Not yet recruiting
Comparing two procedures for large kidney stones

This study compares two ways to remove large staghorn kidney stones: one uses a thin scope through the urinary tract, the other uses a small cut in the back to reach the kidney directly. The goal is to see which method is safer and works better for patients.

Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia
NCT07306819Recruiting
Two kidney stone removal methods compared

This study compares two ways to remove kidney stones: mini-PCNL (a small incision in your back) versus flexible ureteroscopy with a suction sheath (a tube through the urinary tract). It aims to find which method works better and is safer for stones of this size.

Cairo
NCT07697677Recruiting
Mini versus standard surgery for complex kidney stones

This study compares two ways to surgically remove large or complex kidney stones. It tests whether a less invasive approach works as well as the standard surgery, with the goal of reducing recovery time and complications.

Guangzhou, Guangdong
NCT07193940Not yet recruiting
Flexible tube versus shock wave for lower kidney stones

This study compares two common procedures to remove a kidney stone from the lower part of the kidney: flexible ureteroscopy (a tube with a camera to break up the stone) and shock wave lithotripsy (using sound waves from outside the body to break the stone). It helps determine which method works better for stones up to 15 millimeters.

Asyut
NCT07159503Enrolling by invitation
Comparing two procedures for 2-4cm kidney stones

This trial compares two methods to remove kidney stones that are 2-4 cm in size: one uses a thin tube through a small cut in your back (VISOR), and the other uses a larger cut (PCNL). The goal is to see which approach works better and has fewer side effects.

Hangzhou, Zhejiang
NCT07763743Recruiting
Comparing two kidney stone removal methods

This study compares two minimally invasive procedures to remove small-to-medium kidney stones (1 to 2.5 cm). The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective, possibly leading to quicker recovery and fewer side effects.

Cairo, Abbasia

Hear when a new Renal Stones trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.