Comparing two kidney stone removal methods
This study compares two minimally invasive procedures to remove small-to-medium kidney stones (1 to 2.5 cm). The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective, possibly leading to quicker recovery and fewer side effects.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You have a kidney stone that is between 1 and 2.5 centimeters in size, confirmed by a CT scan or ultrasound.
- You do not have an untreated urinary tract infection (UTI) at the time of screening.
- Your blood clotting is normal, or any clotting issues have been corrected.
- You do not have any anatomical abnormalities or narrowing in the ureter (the tube that carries urine) that would prevent these procedures.
- You have not had any prior surgery on the same kidney.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two ways to remove kidney stones: mini-PCNL (a small incision in your back) versus flexible ureteroscopy with a suction sheath (a tube through the urinary tract). It aims to find which method works better and is safer for stones of this size.
This study compares two methods of using a thin, flexible scope to remove kidney stones smaller than 2 cm in children. One method uses a standard tube, and the other uses a special flexible tube that can suction out stone fragments. The goal is to see which approach works better and is safer for kids.
This trial compares two minimally invasive surgeries for removing kidney stones that are 2 to 3 cm in size. It aims to find which technique is more effective and has fewer side effects.
This study compares two types of surgery (mini PCNL and flexible ureteroscopy) to remove kidney stones in children. The goal is to find out which approach works better and causes fewer side effects.
This trial compares two different surgical methods for removing medium-sized kidney stones (about the size of a grape) using a minimally invasive camera procedure. The goal is to see which approach works better and causes fewer complications.
This study compares two minimally invasive procedures to remove large staghorn kidney stones: one through a small tube in the back (PCNL) and the other through the urinary tract with a flexible scope (ureteroscopy). It helps determine which method is safer and works better.
Hear when a new Pediatric Renal Stones trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.