Comparing carbon footprint of robotic, laparoscopic, and open colorectal surgery
Part of Digestive system clinical trials.
This study measures the environmental impact (carbon footprint) of different surgical techniques for removing part of the colon or rectum. It aims to find which approach is more sustainable without compromising patient care.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are scheduled for elective (non-emergency) colorectal surgery that involves removing a section of your colon or rectum.
- Your surgery is planned as robotic-assisted, laparoscopic (keyhole), or open surgery.
- You will receive general anesthesia during the procedure.
- You are at least 18 years old.
- Your physical health status is classified as ASA I, II, or III (generally healthy to mild-to-moderate systemic disease).
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares how quickly and how well people recover after surgery to remove part of the colon or rectum, using either a robotic or a laparoscopic (keyhole) approach. Both are minimally invasive, but this trial aims to see if one leads to a smoother and faster recovery.
This study looks at how surgeons' bodies are affected when they do surgery using standard laparoscopic (small-incision) tools compared with robotic systems. It compares two types of robotic surgery – one for rectal removal and one for prostate removal – to see which method is less physically stressful for the surgeon.
This study compares two types of minimally invasive surgery—robotic and laparoscopic—for people with inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's or ulcerative colitis) who need elective colon or rectal surgery. It aims to find out which approach might be better for recovery and outcomes.
This study compares the outcomes of two minimally invasive surgery techniques for right colon cancer: robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery. It aims to see which approach has better short-term and long-term results, which can help patients and doctors choose the best treatment.
This study checks how well a newer single-opening (single-port) robot works for colorectal surgery. It may help surgeons perform operations with the robotic system in carefully selected colorectal conditions.
This study compares pain levels after two types of minimally invasive colon cancer surgery: robotic and laparoscopic. It aims to see if one approach leads to less pain, which may help you recover more comfortably.
Hear when a new Colorectal Operations trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.