Clin2
NCT06956833Possibly a fitRecruiting

Virtual reality learning: self-guided vs guided debriefing

Virtual Reality SimulationSimulation-based Medical EducationPediatric Emergency MedicineImmersive Virtual RealityDebriefing

This trial tests two ways of learning after a virtual reality simulation: one where you talk it through with a guide, and one where you do it on your own. It looks at how these different approaches help medical students learn and feel.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
88 people
Ages
Any age
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are currently a medical student at a Danish medical school.
  • You will graduate within 2 years.
  • You can give your informed consent to join the trial.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07361913Not yet recruiting
Virtual reality versus traditional teaching for trainee anaesthetists

This study compares two ways for trainee anaesthetists to learn about regional anaesthesia (numbing specific body areas for surgery): using virtual reality (VR) versus a traditional teaching method. If you are a trainee anaesthetist, this could help improve how future doctors are trained.

NCT06612619Recruiting
Virtual reality training for hip fracture surgery in doctors

This trial compares two-on-one versus one-on-one virtual reality training for medical students learning to operate on hip fractures. It aims to see if having two instructors for every student is more effective than the usual one-on-one approach.

Copenhagen
NCT06968260Not yet recruiting
Virtual reality CPR training: instructor vs software guidance

This study compares two ways of teaching CPR (Basic Life Support) using virtual reality: one guided by an instructor and one guided by software. It looks at how stress and learning differ between these two methods, helping improve training for beginners.

NCT07558551Recruiting
Virtual Reality vs. Traditional Anatomy Learning

This study compares two ways of teaching anatomy to first-year medical students: using virtual reality headsets versus traditional classroom methods. Researchers want to see which approach helps students learn better and feel more confident about anatomy.

Kyrenia, Keryneia
NCT06839573Not yet recruiting
Virtual reality for nursing students' learning

This study tests whether immersive virtual reality can help nursing students learn, compared to traditional methods. If you've already done the in-person simulation, you may be able to join.

NCT07079059Not yet recruiting
Virtual reality for anesthesia training in medical students

This study tests whether using virtual reality (VR) helps medical students learn anesthesia skills better than standard training. If you're a third-year medical student about to start your anesthesia rotation, you might be able to join and help improve how future doctors train.

Hear when a new Virtual Reality Simulation trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.