Clin2
NCT07138287Possibly a fitRecruiting

Growth Factor vs Mineral Trioxide for Kids' Permanent Teeth

Concerned Growth Factor Versus Miniral Trioide Aggregate in Management of Mature Permanent Molar With Irreversible Pulpitis

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two treatments for children’s permanent back teeth with severe, painful nerve inflammation (irreversible pulpitis). It aims to find which approach works better to save the tooth and relieve pain.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
200 people
Ages
9 years to 16 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • The tooth must be a permanent molar (back tooth) that is fully grown in (closed root tip).
  • The tooth must have irreversible pulpitis (inflamed nerve that won’t heal).
  • Your child must not have any medical conditions that require special care.
  • The tooth must be restorable (can be fixed with a filling or crown).
  • The tooth must still be alive (not dead/necrotic).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07168811Not yet recruiting
Comparing three materials for nerve treatment in baby teeth

This study compares three materials used during a pulpotomy (a type of baby tooth nerve treatment) to see which works best for saving the tooth. It may help your child keep their baby tooth healthy until it falls out naturally.

Cairo
NCT06640205Recruiting
New treatment for painful tooth pulp in molars

This trial tests two different materials to treat the inflamed pulp in your back teeth. It compares a special type of blood concentrate (I-PRF) with a mix of nano MTA and blood concentrate to see which is better at saving the tooth and relieving pain.

Cairo
NCT06871709Not yet recruiting
Comparing two materials for preserving nerves in baby molars

This study compares two materials used to treat deep decay in baby molars by preserving the nerve inside the tooth. The goal is to see which material works better and helps the tooth heal without pain or infection.

Cairo
NCT06809478Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for nerve pain in baby back teeth

This study compares two treatments for deep cavities in baby molars that affect the tooth's nerve. It tests whether a natural material (chitosan) works as well as a standard one (formocresol) to save the tooth and avoid early loss.

Cairo
NCT07415694Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to treat infected baby molars in young children

This study compares a newer, faster dental tool (single rotary file) with the traditional manual method for cleaning infected baby molars. It aims to see if the newer tool makes the procedure more comfortable and successful for children.

Cairo
NCT07630181Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for painful molars

This study compares two materials used to treat an inflamed tooth nerve in adults. It aims to see which one is better at preserving the tooth and relieving pain.

Lahore, Punjab Province

Hear when a new Concerned Growth Factor Versus Miniral Trioide Aggregate in Management of Mature Permanent Molar With Irreversible Pulpitis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.