Clin2
NCT07184346Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two ways to record your bite position

Centric Relation Registration

This study compares two ways of recording your jaw's bite position—the traditional method and a newer digital one. The goal is to see if the digital method is just as accurate, which could make dental fittings more comfortable for patients.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
20 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be at least 18 years old.
  • You should have generally good oral health (no major gum disease or untreated tooth decay).
  • You need to have some natural teeth remaining (either a full set or a partial set).
  • You cannot have a jaw joint disorder, such as jaw pain or clicking.
  • You cannot have a limited mouth opening; your jaw must be able to open normally.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07203703Not yet recruiting
Comparing jaw tracking and traditional methods for measuring bite accuracy

This study compares two ways to measure how accurately your teeth fit together when you bite. It may help find a more comfortable and precise method for dental care.

NCT07490483Enrolling by invitation
Comparing jaw tracking and paper for bite registration

This study compares two ways of recording how your teeth come together: using a special jaw tracking device versus using a piece of paper that leaves marks. It helps find the best method for accurate bite registration, which is important for dental treatments like fillings or crowns.

Cairo
NCT07740798Not yet recruiting
Comparing dental scanners for denture impressions

This study tests two types of dental scanners to see which one makes more accurate impressions for people with no teeth. It might help find a more comfortable and precise way to create dentures.

NCT07190820Enrolling by invitation
Comparing digital vs. traditional dental implant impressions

This study compares digital and traditional methods for taking dental impressions in people who have a full arch of implants supporting a permanent fixed bridge. It aims to see which method is more accurate.

Shanghai
NCT06773728Not yet recruiting
Digital jaw tracking for full-arch dental restorations

This study tests a new digital method for planning full-arch dental restorations (like bridges or implants for all teeth) using a jaw tracking system to improve how your teeth fit together. It may help make your new teeth feel more natural and function better.

Athens, Attica
NCT07074340Not yet recruiting
Comparing traditional and digital bite splints for jaw pain

This study compares two ways of making a custom bite splint for jaw pain: one made the traditional way with molds, and one made using computer scanning and 3D printing. Both splints are designed to relieve muscle and joint pain in the jaw area, and the goal is to see which method works better.

Hear when a new Centric Relation Registration trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.