Comparing digital vs. traditional dental implant impressions
Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Mouth & dental clinical trials.
This study compares digital and traditional methods for taking dental impressions in people who have a full arch of implants supporting a permanent fixed bridge. It aims to see which method is more accurate.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- Ages 30 to 80 years old
- Getting a full arch (all teeth in upper or lower jaw) of permanent implant-supported fixed bridge
- Healed and stable dental implants after surgery
- Willing to participate and sign a consent form
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two ways of taking dental impressions (molds) for making a full-arch implant-supported denture. One method uses a digital scanner, the other uses traditional dental putty. The goal is to see if one results in a more comfortable and precise fit.
This trial tests two different ways of taking digital scans of the mouth to make a full set of teeth supported by four implants in the lower jaw. It compares a standard scanning method with a new pattern-assisted technique to see which is more accurate.
This study tests how accurately a digital scanning method (photogrammetry) can measure and plan treatment for patients with implant-supported full-mouth dental replacements. If you have multiple dental implants supporting a complete denture or bridge, researchers want to see if this scanning technique gives reliable measurements to help design better-fitting prosthetics.
This study compares two types of dental scanners to see which one gives more accurate impressions for denture or implant planning in people with no teeth. Your participation could help improve scanning methods for edentulous patients.
This trial compares three ways to take dental impressions for full-arch implant-supported prostheses: traditional putty, intraoral scanning, and digital photogrammetry. It aims to find which method is most accurate, which could help improve comfort and fit for people with multiple dental implants.
This trial tests a faster digital scanning method using a special camera (photogrammetry) versus a standard intraoral scanner for making a full set of implant-supported teeth. It aims to see which method leads to fewer problems with the final restoration.
Hear when a new Edentulous Jaw trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.