Clin2
NCT07778199Possibly a fitRecruiting

Implant denture fitting: digital vs traditional dental impressions

Dental ImplantsEdentulous JawPassive Fit

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares two ways of taking dental impressions (molds) for making a full-arch implant-supported denture. One method uses a digital scanner, the other uses traditional dental putty. The goal is to see if one results in a more comfortable and precise fit.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
8 people
Ages
35 years to 70 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have no natural teeth and need a full-arch denture supported by implants
  • You are between 35 and 70 years old
  • Your lower jaw (mandible) has enough bone to support at least four implants without a major bone graft
  • You are able to cooperate with dental scans and x-rays
  • You have no serious health conditions that affect healing, such as uncontrolled diabetes or immune problems
  • You have not had radiation to the head or neck, and have not taken bisphosphonate drugs
  • You do not have an active mouth infection, severe teeth grinding, or a strong gag reflex that would interfere with scanning

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07065487Recruiting
Comparing two digital scanning methods for full-arch implant teeth

This trial tests two different ways of taking digital scans of the mouth to make a full set of teeth supported by four implants in the lower jaw. It compares a standard scanning method with a new pattern-assisted technique to see which is more accurate.

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate
NCT07643441Recruiting
Testing digital scanning accuracy for full-arch dental implants

This study tests how accurately a digital scanning method (photogrammetry) can measure and plan treatment for patients with implant-supported full-mouth dental replacements. If you have multiple dental implants supporting a complete denture or bridge, researchers want to see if this scanning technique gives reliable measurements to help design better-fitting prosthetics.

Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia
NCT07190820Enrolling by invitation
Comparing digital vs. traditional dental implant impressions

This study compares digital and traditional methods for taking dental impressions in people who have a full arch of implants supporting a permanent fixed bridge. It aims to see which method is more accurate.

Shanghai
NCT07740798Not yet recruiting
Comparing dental scanners for people with no teeth

This study compares two types of dental scanners to see which one gives more accurate impressions for denture or implant planning in people with no teeth. Your participation could help improve scanning methods for edentulous patients.

NCT07446790Recruiting
Comparing two digital methods for full-arch implant bridges

This trial tests a faster digital scanning method using a special camera (photogrammetry) versus a standard intraoral scanner for making a full set of implant-supported teeth. It aims to see which method leads to fewer problems with the final restoration.

Cairo
NCT07723404Recruiting
Comparing two ways to scan dental implants for a new bridge

This trial compares two techniques for scanning dental implants in the upper jaw to make a new permanent bridge or denture. It aims to find which method gives a more accurate fit.

Shibīn al Kawm, Shibin Alkom

Hear when a new Edentulous Jaw trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.