Clin2
NCT07230717Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two treatments for infected baby teeth

Pulp TherapyPulpitis - IrreversiblePulp Necrosis

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of treating badly infected or dead nerves in back baby teeth, to see which works better. It aims to relieve pain and save the teeth until they naturally fall out.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
30 people
Ages
4 years to 8 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • Your child should be in overall good health
  • They need to have two matching back baby teeth (one on each side) that are severely infected or have dead nerves
  • There may be signs of infection like a gum bump or small abscess
  • The affected teeth should be loose only a tiny bit or not loose at all
  • The teeth should be repairable with a filling or crown

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06929247Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for painful baby molars in children

This study compares two ways to treat severe pain in baby molars (primary molars) in children. It tests a newer material (Neoputty MTA) against a standard one (Metapex) to see which works better in saving the tooth and relieving pain.

NCT06922578Not yet recruiting
Two ways to treat deep decay in baby molars

This study compares two ways to treat severe tooth decay in baby molars that has reached the nerve. One method removes part of the nerve and puts a special material on it; the other removes all the nerve and fills it with a different material. The goal is to see which approach saves the tooth better and relieves pain.

NCT06871709Not yet recruiting
Comparing two materials for preserving nerves in baby molars

This study compares two materials used to treat deep decay in baby molars by preserving the nerve inside the tooth. The goal is to see which material works better and helps the tooth heal without pain or infection.

Cairo
NCT05964933Enrolling by invitation
Pulpotomy vs root canal for painful nerve inflammation

This trial compares two treatments for a tooth nerve that is very inflamed and causing lingering pain: a pulpotomy versus a full root canal. It may help you choose the approach that best relieves symptoms and supports healing for the right kind of tooth.

Singapore
NCT07522723Not yet recruiting
Comparing three pulp-protecting materials for children's back teeth

This study tests three materials used to protect the nerve of a decayed baby (permanent) tooth in children, helping it heal and continue growing. It compares two newer materials to an older standard one.

NCT06904781Recruiting
Pulp treatment for baby teeth with severe toothache

This study compares two ways to treat severe tooth decay in baby molars: removing only the top part of the nerve (pulpotomy) versus removing all of the nerve (pulpectomy). It aims to see which method works better for saving the tooth and relieving pain.

Irbid

Hear when a new Pulp Therapy trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.