Clin2
NCT07295860Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two keyhole surgeries for medium kidney stones

Stone, KidneyStone, Urinary

Part of Kidney & urinary, Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This trial compares two minimally invasive surgeries for removing kidney stones that are 2–3 cm in size. One uses a special vacuum to help clear stone fragments, and the other uses suction. Both are done through a small tube in the back, and the goal is to see which approach is safer and more effective.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
254 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years old or older.
  • You have one or more kidney stones that are between 2 and 3 centimeters (about the size of a large grape).
  • You do not have a urinary tract infection before surgery (a simple urine test can confirm).
  • You can safely receive general anesthesia (being put to sleep) or spinal anesthesia (numbing from the waist down).
  • You sign a consent form agreeing to take part.
  • You do not have certain kidney shape problems, severe narrowings, or bleeding risks that would make the procedure unsafe.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07306819Recruiting
Two kidney stone removal methods compared

This study compares two ways to remove kidney stones: mini-PCNL (a small incision in your back) versus flexible ureteroscopy with a suction sheath (a tube through the urinary tract). It aims to find which method works better and is safer for stones of this size.

Cairo
NCT07763743Recruiting
Comparing two kidney stone removal methods

This study compares two minimally invasive procedures to remove small-to-medium kidney stones (1 to 2.5 cm). The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective, possibly leading to quicker recovery and fewer side effects.

Cairo, Abbasia
NCT07749807Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to remove kidney stones through a small back incision

This study compares two methods for removing kidney stones when they are too large or complex for other treatments. Both methods use a small cut in the back to reach the kidney, and the goal is to find which approach works better with fewer complications.

Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate
NCT07058402Recruiting
Comparing two kidney stone surgeries for medium stones

This trial compares two different surgeries for removing a single kidney stone that is 2 to 3 centimeters in size. One method uses a flexible scope with a suction tube, and the other uses a small incision in the back. The goal is to see which works better and has fewer side effects.

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality
NCT07463157Not yet recruiting
Comparing two kidney stone treatment tools

This study compares two methods used during surgery to remove kidney stones. It will see if a new device is as safe and effective as the standard one for breaking up and removing stones.

Milan
NCT07159503Enrolling by invitation
Comparing two procedures for 2-4cm kidney stones

This trial compares two methods to remove kidney stones that are 2-4 cm in size: one uses a thin tube through a small cut in your back (VISOR), and the other uses a larger cut (PCNL). The goal is to see which approach works better and has fewer side effects.

Hangzhou, Zhejiang

Hear when a new Stone, Kidney trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.