Clin2
NCT07344038Possibly a fitRecruiting

Bioceramic Putty vs MTA and Crowns for Baby Teeth

Caries Active

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two types of putty used to treat the nerve of a deep cavity in a baby tooth, and then looks at two types of crowns (caps) placed on top. It's for healthy children ages 5–7 who need this treatment on a back baby tooth.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
60 people
Ages
5 years to 7 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • Child must be between 5 and 7 years old
  • Child must be in good general health
  • Child must be cooperative for dental work
  • The tooth must be a deep cavity in a back baby tooth that is still healthy (nerve alive, no pain on its own)
  • The tooth must need a full crown (cap) after treatment

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06219824Not yet recruiting· Phase 3
Comparing Bioceramic Putty MTA vs MTA in child tooth nerve treatment

This study compares two types of filling material (bioceramic putty MTA and regular MTA) used in a pulpotomy—a procedure to save a decayed young permanent molar by removing the infected nerve part and sealing the rest. It aims to see which material works better for keeping the tooth healthy and helping its roots develop normally.

Cairo
NCT07437794Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for saving baby back teeth

This study compares two treatments for saving a decayed baby back tooth: a newer material called Neo Putty MTA and a standard medicine called formocresol. Both are used during a procedure (pulpotomy) that removes the infected part of the tooth nerve to keep the tooth healthy until it falls out naturally.

Giza, Giza Governorate
NCT06288477Recruiting
Comparing two treatments for baby molar teeth with deep decay

This study compares two treatments for baby molar teeth that have deep decay but are still healthy otherwise: a newer material called Neo-putty (a type of bioceramic material) versus a standard medicine called formocresol. The goal is to see which one works better to keep the tooth healthy and prevent further problems.

El-Sheikh Zayed City, Giza Governorate
NCT07523776Not yet recruiting
Comparing two crown types for treated baby molars

This study compares two types of crowns used to protect baby back teeth after root canal treatment. Researchers want to see if one type keeps the bite height more stable than the other over time.

Cairo, Giza/Egypt
NCT06968767Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of crowns for baby molars

This study compares how long it takes to prepare Bioflx crowns versus zirconia crowns for covering a baby molar, and whether one works better. It is for healthy children aged 4 to 8 who need a crown on a back baby tooth.

Cairo, Egypt
NCT07094854Not yet recruiting
New filling material for treated baby molars

This study tests a new type of filling material (Alkasite bioactive material) for baby molars that have had pulpotomy (nerve removal). It aims to see how well this material works compared to standard treatment in children.

Alexandria

Hear when a new Caries Active trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.