Clin2
NCT07424820Possibly a fitEnrolling by invitation

Magnetic mallet vs. drilling for dental implants in soft jawbone

Alveolar Bone LossDental ImplantOsseodensification Drilling Technique

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares two techniques for placing dental implants in the upper jaw where the bone is very soft (type D4). It tests whether a magnetic mallet (a tool that uses gentle taps) is better than conventional drilling for placing implants in this challenging bone type.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
30 people
Ages
20 years to 60 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are missing at least one upper back tooth and the gum has fully healed
  • You have at least 11 mm of bone height in that area, so no sinus lift is needed
  • Your jawbone in that spot is very soft (type D4)
  • You do not have any health conditions that slow bone healing, such as uncontrolled diabetes
  • You do not have an active infection in your mouth
  • You do not smoke

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07066930Not yet recruiting
Improving bone width for dental implants

This trial tests a method to widen the jawbone so there's enough room for a dental implant. It may help people who have lost some teeth and have a narrow ridge of bone.

Erbil
NCT07077915Enrolling by invitation
New drilling method vs. standard for immediate dental implants

This trial tests a new drilling method called osseodensification (which makes the bone denser) versus the standard way of drilling for placing a dental implant right after pulling a tooth. It is for people who need a lower back molar removed and want an implant placed immediately.

Beirut
NCT07719283Not yet recruiting
Comparing two sinus lift methods for dental implants

This study compares two ways to lift the sinus floor and place multiple dental implants at the same time when there is only a small amount of bone (4-5 mm) under the sinus. One method uses a rotating tool to gently shape the bone, the other uses a tapping tool. The goal is to see which approach leads to better healing and patient comfort.

Beirut
NCT06764654Recruiting
Comparing two guided surgery methods for back jaw implants

This study compares two types of guided surgery methods for placing dental implants in the back of the jaw (where there are missing teeth). It aims to find which technique works better for patients who need implants in that area.

Alicante, Alicante
NCT06450535Recruiting
Comparing two bone grafting methods for the upper jaw

This trial tests two surgical methods to rebuild a narrow upper jaw so it can support dental implants. It compares using a solid block of your own bone versus a thin shell of bone to widen the ridge.

Cairo, Giza Governorate
NCT06677125Recruiting
Magnetic mallet and special drill for sinus lift in dental implants

This study tests two tools (a magnetic mallet and a special drill) used to lift the sinus floor during dental implant placement in the upper jaw. It may help people who need implants but have limited bone height.

Alexandria

Hear when a new Alveolar Bone Loss trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.