Clin2
NCT07424820Possibly a fitEnrolling by invitation

Magnetic mallet vs. drilling for dental implants in soft jawbone

Alveolar Bone LossDental ImplantOsseodensification Drilling Technique

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares two techniques for placing dental implants in the upper jaw where the bone is very soft (type D4). It tests whether a magnetic mallet (a tool that uses gentle taps) is better than conventional drilling for placing implants in this challenging bone type.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
30 people
Ages
20 years to 60 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are missing at least one upper back tooth and the gum has fully healed
  • You have at least 11 mm of bone height in that area, so no sinus lift is needed
  • Your jawbone in that spot is very soft (type D4)
  • You do not have any health conditions that slow bone healing, such as uncontrolled diabetes
  • You do not have an active infection in your mouth
  • You do not smoke

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07066930Not yet recruiting
Improving dental implant success with jawbone expansion

This study tests a technique to widen a narrow jawbone so dental implants can be placed. It aims to make the procedure safe and effective for people who are missing teeth but don't have enough bone width.

Erbil
NCT07077915Enrolling by invitation
New drilling method vs. standard for immediate dental implants

This trial tests a new drilling method called osseodensification (which makes the bone denser) versus the standard way of drilling for placing a dental implant right after pulling a tooth. It is for people who need a lower back molar removed and want an implant placed immediately.

Beirut
NCT07719283Not yet recruiting
Comparing two methods for sinus lift and implant placement

This study compares two techniques to lift the sinus floor and place dental implants at the same time in people with limited bone height. It aims to find which method is more effective and comfortable for patients.

Beirut
NCT06764654Recruiting
Comparing two guided surgery methods for back jaw implants

This study compares two types of guided surgery methods for placing dental implants in the back of the jaw (where there are missing teeth). It aims to find which technique works better for patients who need implants in that area.

Alicante, Alicante
NCT07589140Not yet recruiting
How drilling affects dental implant healing after tooth removal

This study looks at how the way a dentist drills into the jawbone for a dental implant affects how well the implant attaches to the bone. It requires people who are already scheduled to have teeth removed, to see if the drilling method makes a difference in healing.

Panevezys
NCT06242782Not yet recruiting· Phase 3
Comparing ways to rebuild jawbone for dental implants

This study tests two different surgical methods to rebuild the jawbone where teeth are missing, so that dental implants can be placed securely. It aims to find which approach is safer and works better for patients with vertical bone loss.

Hear when a new Alveolar Bone Loss trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.