Clin2
NCT07522424Likely a fitNot yet recruiting

Reused vs. New Catheters for Heart Rhythm Ablation

Arhythmia

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This study compares reprocessed (cleaned and sterilized) ablation catheters to brand-new ones during heart rhythm procedures. The goal is to see if reused catheters work just as well, cost less, and have less environmental impact.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
200 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are at least 18 years old
  • Your doctor has recommended ablation (a procedure to fix irregular heartbeats) based on current medical guidelines
  • You are willing to sign a consent form agreeing to participate
  • You do not have severe heart valve disease
  • You do not have significant structural heart problems that would make ablation unsafe or impossible
  • You are not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and have a life expectancy of at least 12 months

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07389434Recruiting
Testing reused catheters for atrial fibrillation treatment

This trial tests whether reusing special catheters to treat atrial fibrillation is safe, effective, and better for costs and the environment. It may help people with atrial fibrillation who need a procedure called pulmonary vein isolation.

Zagreb
NCT07563257Recruiting
Comparing Two Mapping Catheters for Heart Rhythm Ablation

This trial compares two types of specialized catheters used during heart rhythm ablation procedures to help doctors confirm they've created the right burn patterns. If you're having ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation or flutter with complex burn lines planned, this trial may help improve how your procedure is done.

Be’er Ya‘aqov
NCT07783919Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of ablation for atrial fibrillation

This study compares two ways to perform a heart procedure called ablation to treat atrial fibrillation, a condition that causes an irregular heartbeat. The goal is to find out which approach is safer and more effective at restoring a normal heart rhythm.

Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia
NCT06866704Not yet recruiting
Comparing heart procedures for persistent atrial fibrillation

This trial tests two different ablation techniques to treat a type of irregular heartbeat that doesn't go away on its own. It aims to find which approach works better and is safer.

NCT07036965Recruiting
Comparing two types of ablation catheters for atrial fibrillation

This trial tests two different catheters that use pulsed field energy to treat atrial fibrillation (a heart rhythm problem). It aims to find which one works better for people who need blood thinners but have a high risk of bleeding.

Hangzhou
NCT07390214Recruiting
Comparing two catheters for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation

This study compares two types of catheters (AFFERA vs. standard contact-force guided) for a repeat ablation procedure in people whose atrial fibrillation or related symptoms returned after a first ablation. It aims to find which catheter works best for a second treatment.

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse

Hear when a new Arhythmia trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.