Clin2
NCT06791629Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two ablation methods for persistent atrial fibrillation

Persistent Atrial FibrillationRadiofrequency Catheter AblationPulsed Field Ablation

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This trial compares two ways to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts for months or years). One method uses pulsed field energy and the other uses radiofrequency heat to fix the heart's electrical signals. The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective for patients having their first ablation procedure.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
700 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 18 and 80 years old.
  • You have persistent atrial fibrillation (lasting from 3 months up to 3 years) and have not had a prior ablation for it.
  • Your left atrium (a heart chamber) is not too enlarged, as measured by an echocardiogram.
  • You agree to be randomly assigned to one of the two ablation methods and are able to attend follow-up visits.
  • You do not have severe heart, liver, or kidney disease, and you have not had heart surgery or certain heart procedures before.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07601763Recruiting
Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment

This trial tests a newer ablation technique called pulsed field ablation to treat atrial fibrillation, a heart rhythm disorder. The goal is to see if this method works well and is safe for patients who need treatment.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT07405359Recruiting
Comparing ablation methods for persistent atrial fibrillation

This trial tests a newer, possibly safer way to treat persistent atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation. It compares standard vein isolation alone to adding extra ablation spots to improve success.

San Francisco, California
NCT07815171Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ablation catheters for persistent atrial fibrillation

This study compares two different catheters used in ablation procedures to treat persistent atrial fibrillation, a type of irregular heartbeat that lasts for weeks or months. The goal is to find out which catheter is more effective at restoring normal rhythm, and you will receive a small monitor under your skin to track your heart for a year.

Paris
NCT06985901Recruiting
Pulsed-field ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

This trial tests a new type of ablation (pulsed-field) to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (AFib) that lasts more than 7 days. You may qualify if you have symptoms and haven't had other heart ablation procedures except for one specific type.

Nice
NCT07819175Not yet recruiting
Pulsed field ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

This study tests a new heart procedure using pulsed field ablation (a type of energy to fix irregular heartbeats) for people who have had atrial fibrillation for less than a year. It may help restore a normal heart rhythm and reduce symptoms.

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality
NCT05723536Recruiting
Comparing two procedures for persistent atrial fibrillation

This study compares two ways to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts for a long time). One method uses a catheter to treat the heart from the inside, and the other combines that with a small procedure on the outside of the heart. The goal is to see which approach works better for people whose symptoms haven't improved with medication.

Barcelona

Hear when a new Persistent Atrial Fibrillation trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.