Clin2
NCT07523815Possibly a fitRecruiting

AI-Assisted versus Standard Planning for Dental Implants

Partially Edentulous Mandible

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares using artificial intelligence computer planning versus standard planning methods for placing a single dental implant in your back teeth. The goal is to see if AI planning makes the implant placement faster, easier, and more precise.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
Phase 4
Enrollment
20 people
Ages
18 years to 50 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have a partially missing tooth (Kennedy Class III) in the back of your mouth that hasn't been replaced yet
  • You are between 18 and 60 years old
  • Your neighboring teeth are healthy and don't need new fillings or crowns
  • You have healthy bone density in the implant area
  • You are not pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study
  • You don't smoke heavily or have untreated infections in your mouth

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07657910Not yet recruiting
Digital bite optimization for lower implant-supported partial dentures

This study tests a new digital method for making a lower partial denture that is attached to two implants, to improve how your bite feels. The aim is to see if computer-guided bite adjustment makes the denture fit and function better.

Giza
NCT07711613Not yet recruiting
AI-guided dental implant placement for missing front teeth

This trial tests a computer-assisted guide that helps dentists place dental implants more accurately in the upper front area. It may improve the precision of implant placement and reduce complications.

Ismailia
NCT07432165Recruiting
AI vs. Digital Design for Fixed Dental Prostheses

This study compares artificial intelligence (AI) versus conventional digital methods to design fixed dental prostheses like crowns and bridges. It may help improve how these replacements are created.

Giza
NCT07291336Recruiting· Phase 4
Comparing two ways to place dental implants

This trial compares two methods for placing dental implants in the upper jaw: dynamic navigation (real-time guidance) versus static navigation (using a surgical guide). It aims to see which technique is more accurate for people missing one tooth between the right and left second premolars.

Cairo
NCT07863700Recruiting
Immediate implant placement accuracy after tooth extraction

This study tests how accurate dental implants are when placed immediately after removing a lower back tooth. It aims to see if this approach works well and helps patients get a stable new tooth quickly.

Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia
NCT07091786Enrolling by invitation· Phase 2/Phase 3
Complete digital workflow for full-arch implants

This trial tests a fully digital method for placing dental implants in people who are missing all teeth on one or both jaws. It aims to see if the digital approach is accurate and reliable.

Al Mansurah

Hear when a new Partially Edentulous Mandible trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.