Clin2
NCT07600333Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two breathing devices for sleep apnea in children

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

Part of Brain & nervous system, Lungs & breathing clinical trials.

This study compares two common breathing devices used to treat sleep apnea in children: CPAP and high-flow nasal cannula. It aims to see which one works better, which may help your child sleep and breathe easier.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
258 people
Ages
2 years to 18 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • Your child is between 2 and 18 years old.
  • Your child has moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea, with a sleep study (within the last 6 months) showing an apnea-hypopnea index of 5 or higher.
  • Your doctor has already decided that CPAP is a usual part of their care.
  • Your child has not used CPAP or high-flow nasal cannula for sleep apnea in the last 12 months.
  • Your child does not have central sleep apnea, chronic respiratory failure, or other conditions requiring certain ventilatory support.
  • Your child does not have a history of pneumothorax (collapsed lung) or uncontrolled reflux, vomiting, or oral secretions.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07679282Recruiting· Phase 4
Comparing sleep apnea treatments: CPAP, mouthpiece, or medication

This study compares three treatments for obstructive sleep apnea: a CPAP machine, a dental mouthpiece, and a combination of two medications (atomoxetine and oxybutynin). Researchers want to see which works best for people recently diagnosed with sleep apnea.

Tucson, Arizona
NCT07677332Not yet recruiting
Mouth device versus CPAP for moderate sleep apnea

This study compares two common treatments for moderate sleep apnea: a custom mouthpiece that gently advances your jaw, and a CPAP machine that blows air to keep your airway open. The goal is to see which treatment works better for improving sleep and daytime symptoms.

Copenhagen
NCT04191512Recruiting
Comparing two treatments for sleep apnea

This study compares two common treatments for moderate to severe sleep apnea: a device that keeps your airway open during sleep and a machine that delivers air pressure. It aims to see which works better for people like you.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
NCT06413134Not yet recruiting
Comparing two cpap machines for sleep apnea

This study compares two different types of positive airway pressure (PAP) machines to see which one you prefer and are more likely to use consistently. It aims to find the best option for you and improve your sleep apnea treatment.

Murfreesboro, Tennessee
NCT06609694Recruiting
Comparing oxygen delivery methods for children with sleep apnea

This study tests a new way to give oxygen to children aged 5-17 who have obstructive sleep apnea (a condition where breathing stops briefly during sleep). It aims to see if a demand oxygen delivery system works better than standard care. This could help children with Down syndrome who often have untreated sleep apnea.

Cincinnati, Ohio
NCT06634264Recruiting
Comparing two therapies for children with sleep apnea after surgery

This study compares two different exercises (called oral reeducation) to see which works better for children who still have breathing problems during sleep even after getting their tonsils or adenoids removed. It helps kids breathe easier at night.

Montreal, Quebec

Hear when a new Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.