Clin2
NCT07789756Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Ultrasound vs touch for spinal anesthesia in cesarean

Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585)Anesthesia, Spinal (MeSH: D000775)Hypotension (MeSH: D007022)

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to find the right spot on your back for the numbing injection before a planned cesarean. One method uses an ultrasound machine (which uses sound waves to see inside your body) and the other uses the doctor's touch. The goal is to see which method makes the procedure more comfortable and successful for you.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
66 people
Ages
18 years to 45 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are scheduled for a planned (elective) cesarean section with spinal anesthesia.
  • Your age is between 18 and 45 years.
  • Your pregnancy is singleton (one baby).
  • You do not have conditions that prevent spinal anesthesia, and your blood pressure is normal.
  • Your body mass index (BMI) is less than 40.
  • You have not had prior lower back surgery and have no severe spinal deformity.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07567612Not yet recruiting
Back injection pain relief for planned C-sections

This study compares two types of spinal anesthesia (pain-numbing injections) for planned C-sections, one given in the middle back (thoracic) and one in the lower back (lumbar), to see which provides better pain relief and safety for mothers.

Adıyaman, Adıyaman Province
NCT06281249Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound guidance for spinal anesthesia placement

This study tests whether using an ultrasound device helps doctors place spinal or epidural anesthesia more accurately. If you're scheduled for this type of anesthesia, you might be able to participate and receive extra guidance during the procedure to improve safety and comfort.

Stanford, California
NCT07327866Not yet recruiting· Phase 3
Comparing two spinal anesthesia methods for cesarean section

This study compares two types of spinal anesthesia techniques used during a planned cesarean section to see which one is better at preventing a drop in blood pressure. If you are scheduled for a cesarean section, this trial may help improve your care and comfort.

Cairo, Egypt
NCT07416084Not yet recruiting· Phase 2
Comparing two spinal anesthetics for planned cesarean delivery

This study compares two types of spinal anesthesia for planned cesarean sections to see which one causes less of a drop in blood pressure. It may help you and your doctor choose the safest option for your delivery.

Karachi, Sindh
NCT07411521Recruiting
Comparing two pain relief methods after planned cesarean

This trial compares two ways to manage pain after a planned cesarean section: one combines a spinal and epidural injection, the other is a newer type of nerve block. The goal is to see which provides better pain relief with fewer side effects.

Bursa, Nilüfer
NCT07047469Recruiting
Ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in orthopedic surgery

This study compares two ways of giving spinal anesthesia (midline vs. paramedian) using ultrasound guidance in adults having orthopedic surgery. The goal is to see which approach is safer and more effective.

Sohag

Hear when a new Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585) trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.