Clin2
NCT07803757Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Root cavity treatments compared in cancer patients

Dental CariesCervical Caries

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to fix cavities on the roots of teeth in adults who have cancer. One method uses a glass ionomer filling plus a special antibacterial treatment (SMART), and the other uses the standard filling approach. The goal is to see which method works better and lasts longer for people going through cancer treatment.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
40 people
Ages
35 years to 55 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be between 35 and 55 years old and have a cancer diagnosis.
  • You need a cavity on the root of a tooth, near the gumline, that is active (not just a stain).
  • Your teeth must be alive (responsive to cold or electric tests) and not have had fillings before.
  • You should have good oral hygiene and no serious gum disease.
  • You cannot be pregnant, allergic to dental materials, or have braces.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07648485Not yet recruiting
Comparing two tooth-colored fillings for large cavities in back teeth

This study compares two types of tooth-colored fillings (inlays) for large cavities in back teeth. One is made from a hard ceramic-like material made by a computer, and the other is a composite resin filling placed by hand. The goal is to see which one lasts better and works best for repairing big cavities.

NCT06946134Not yet recruiting
Comparing two dental fillings for cavities at the gum line

This study compares two types of tooth-colored filling materials used to repair cavities that form at the gum line on front teeth and premolars (the teeth just behind the canines). Both materials are designed to be easy for dentists to place and may help keep the area healthy. If you have a small to moderate cavity in this area, this trial could help determine which material works better over 18 months.

NCT06497231Not yet recruiting
Comparing two tooth-colored fillings for deep cavities

This trial compares two types of tooth-colored fillings for teeth with deep cavities that extend below the gumline. One filling material is designed to release minerals to help protect the tooth, while the other is a standard strong resin. The goal is to see which material works better for this kind of repair.

NCT07788274Not yet recruiting
Filling materials for cavities in back baby teeth

This study compares two tooth-colored filling materials for cavities in the back baby teeth of children. It aims to see which material works better and lasts longer, helping to keep teeth healthy until they fall out naturally.

Cairo
NCT06889363Not yet recruiting· Phase 2
Comparing two materials for treating deep tooth decay in adult molars

This study compares two materials used to treat deep cavities in permanent molars without causing pain. The goal is to see which material better protects the tooth's nerve and helps the tooth heal, potentially avoiding the need for a root canal.

Giza, القاهرة - Cairo Governorate
NCT07703176Recruiting
Testing a new tooth filling in children's first molars

This study compares how well a newer filling material (Cention-N) works in children's permanent back teeth that have cavities. It's for healthy children ages 8 to 10 who have cavities in both lower or both upper first molars.

Minya, Asyut Governorate

Hear when a new Dental Caries trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.