Clin2
NCT07822308Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Video scope vs standard blade for emergency breathing tube placement

Nasal Intubation

This study compares two ways to place a breathing tube in emergency situations. It aims to find which method is faster and safer for patients, which could improve care for you or your loved one.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
220 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be 18 years old or older.
  • You must need an emergency breathing tube inserted.
  • You cannot have a history of frequent nosebleeds.
  • You cannot have severe heart or lung disease.
  • You cannot have a skull fracture at the base of the skull.
  • You cannot be at high risk of aspiration (breathing in stomach contents).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07667010Not yet recruiting
Comparing two breathing tube tools for emergency c-section

This study compares two different types of breathing tube tools used during emergency cesarean sections under general anesthesia. It aims to find which tool is easier and safer for placing the breathing tube.

Toronto, Ontario
NCT06759038Recruiting
Comparing two devices for placing a breathing tube in lung surgery

This trial compares a new video laryngoscope to a standard one for placing a special breathing tube used in lung surgeries. It aims to see which device works better for patients having planned chest operations.

Karachi, Sindh
NCT06322719Recruiting
Comparing two blades for intubation in the ICU

This trial tests which blade (hyperangulated or Macintosh) works better when doctors use a video laryngoscope to place a breathing tube in intensive care patients. It may help improve how intubation is done in the ICU.

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña
NCT07239141Recruiting
Comparing two video laryngoscopes for intubation during surgery

This trial compares two types of video laryngoscopes (Laringocel® and C-MAC®) to see which one works better for placing a breathing tube in adults having planned surgery under general anesthesia. If you are 18 or older and scheduled for elective surgery, you may be able to join.

Medellín, Antioquia
NCT07624162Recruiting
Comparing Two Airway Viewing Devices During Surgery

This study compares two different video devices that doctors use to see down your throat and place a breathing tube during surgery. The trial tests which device works better and is easier to use while you're under light sedation (medication to keep you calm and comfortable).

Hanover, Lower Saxony
NCT06964295Enrolling by invitation
Comparing two tools for nasal breathing tube placement in ENT surgery

This study compares two ways of putting a breathing tube through the nose during ear, nose, or throat surgery. One uses a video laryngoscope (a camera device) and the other uses a flexible bronchoscope (a thin, bendable tube with a camera). The goal is to see which method works better on the first try.

Seoul

Hear when a new Nasal Intubation trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.