Clin2
NCT04077762Possibly a fitRecruiting

Radial vs femoral access to reduce bleeding in heart procedures

Patient SatisfactionVascular Access Complication

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This study compares two ways doctors can reach the heart during a catheter procedure: through the wrist (radial) or the groin (femoral). It aims to reduce bleeding and access-site complications, especially when patients may need a balloon/stent (PCI).

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
3,266 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older
  • You are having a heart catheter procedure for chest pain/heart blood-flow problems, with possible stent placement
  • Your care team believes you can be safely treated using either wrist or groin access
  • You can sign consent and agree to take part
  • You are not having the specific exclusions listed (like certain emergency heart attacks or needed right-heart catheterization)

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05490238Recruiting
Wrist vs arm access for complex heart procedures

This study compares using the wrist (radial artery) versus a different access site (conventional radial access approach) during complex, larger “bore” heart procedures to open blocked coronary arteries. It aims to see which approach is safer and works better for challenging cases like chronic blockages or heavily calcified arteries.

Arlon
NCT07410364Recruiting
CAG and PCI via distal wrist access for small vessels

This trial tests whether a new wrist access point (the distal radial artery) along with specific drug treatments (CAG and PCI) is safe and effective for people with small blood vessels in the heart. It aims to offer an alternative that may reduce bleeding or damage risks.

Changzhou, Jiangsu
NCT07579169Recruiting
Comparing radiation exposure from two heart procedure access sites

This study compares radiation exposure to doctors performing heart procedures using two different arm access points. It helps determine which approach is safer for medical staff doing these procedures repeatedly.

Osaka
NCT06688747Not yet recruiting
Comparing wrist vs. forearm access for heart catheterization

This study compares two ways to access the wrist artery for heart catheterization—one at the wrist and one slightly higher in the forearm. Researchers use ultrasound to check for any injury to the artery before you go home.

NCT07399392Recruiting
Radial vs. femoral secondary access during TAVI

This trial compares two ways to get a second access site during a TAVI procedure: using the wrist artery (radial) or the groin artery (femoral). The goal is to see which approach is safer and works better for patients like you.

Freiburg im Breisgau
NCT06585917Enrolling by invitation
Comparing two sheath sizes for wrist artery heart procedures

This trial compares two sizes of small tubes (called sheaths) used during a heart procedure to open blocked arteries. The procedure is done through a tiny artery in your wrist, and the goal is to see if a smaller tube works just as well with fewer side effects.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality

Hear when a new Patient Satisfaction trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.