Clin2
NCT05490238Possibly a fitRecruiting

Wrist vs arm access for complex heart procedures

Vascular Access Site Occlusion

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This study compares using the wrist (radial artery) versus a different access site (conventional radial access approach) during complex, larger “bore” heart procedures to open blocked coronary arteries. It aims to see which approach is safer and works better for challenging cases like chronic blockages or heavily calcified arteries.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
708 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You are coming in for chest pain or a heart attack without full artery blockage lifting (unstable angina, NSTEMI, or similar).
  • Your cardiologist plans a complex artery-opening procedure using larger instruments (for example: CTO, left main disease, heavy calcification, complex branch blockages).
  • A specialist expects a 7F guiding catheter will be needed for your procedure.
  • You can sign an informed consent form in writing.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07399392Recruiting
Radial vs. femoral secondary access during TAVI

This trial compares two ways to get a second access site during a TAVI procedure: using the wrist artery (radial) or the groin artery (femoral). The goal is to see which approach is safer and works better for patients like you.

Freiburg im Breisgau
NCT06688747Not yet recruiting
Wrist access comparison for heart procedures

This study compares two ways of inserting a thin tube into your wrist artery for a heart procedure (angiography or PCI). One way is closer to the hand (distal), the other is the traditional spot. The goal is to see which one causes fewer blockages in the forearm after the procedure, using ultrasound to check.

NCT04077762Recruiting
Radial vs femoral access to reduce bleeding in heart procedures

This study compares two ways doctors can reach the heart during a catheter procedure: through the wrist (radial) or the groin (femoral). It aims to reduce bleeding and access-site complications, especially when patients may need a balloon/stent (PCI).

San Francisco, California
NCT06986889Not yet recruiting
Hand function after wrist heart procedures

This study compares hand function after heart tests or treatments done through a small tube in the wrist. It aims to see if using a more distant wrist point helps protect hand movement.

NCT07617259Recruiting
Ultrasound guidance for heart catheterization through wrist artery

This study compares two ways of accessing the heart's blood vessels through the wrist artery during a heart imaging procedure. Researchers will test whether using ultrasound to guide the needle improves the success and safety of the procedure.

Pátrai
NCT07410364Recruiting
CAG and PCI via distal wrist access for small vessels

This trial tests whether a new wrist access point (the distal radial artery) along with specific drug treatments (CAG and PCI) is safe and effective for people with small blood vessels in the heart. It aims to offer an alternative that may reduce bleeding or damage risks.

Changzhou, Jiangsu

Hear when a new Vascular Access Site Occlusion trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.