Pacemaker or nerve-targeting treatment for certain heart rhythm blocks
Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.
This study compares two treatments for specific “AV block” heart rhythm problems: a pacemaker versus a procedure called cardioneuroablation. The goal is to see which approach works better for preventing symptoms like fainting or slow heart rates.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are between 18 and 75 years old
- You have an “AV block” heart rhythm problem that doctors have decided needs a planned (elective) procedure
- Your AV block is not caused by sinus node dysfunction and you do not have bundle branch block as part of the reason for treatment
- You have never had a pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device implanted already
- You are not currently pregnant, and you do not plan pregnancy in the next 12 months
- You are able to understand and take part in the study (including phone/telemedicine if needed)
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two types of pacemaker pacing methods in people with heart block and normal heart pumping function. It looks at how often short bursts of fast heart rhythm occur in the upper heart chambers, which may help improve long-term heart health.
This study tests how a pacemaker affects blood flow and heart health in people with heart block. It aims to see if special pacing settings can improve how the heart works.
This study compares two ways to pace the heart in people who have a slow or blocked heart rhythm. The goal is to find which method works better for patients with certain types of heart block.
This trial looks at different ways to pace the heart (like left, right, or both sides) to see which works best for people who need a pacemaker. If you have a heart condition requiring a pacemaker, this study may help find the safest and most effective option for you.
This trial compares two pacing methods (LBBAP vs RVP) in people with heart block who need a pacemaker. It looks at whether one method reduces the chance of developing atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat). To join, you must have a specific type of heart block, never had atrial fibrillation, and have a healthy pumping heart.
This study compares a procedure called cardioneuroablation with staying on permanent pacing in people who have symptoms from a slow heart rate. It aims to see which approach works better and is safer for reducing symptoms related to sinus node or heart conduction problems.
Hear when a new Atrioventricular Block trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.