Comparing two drainage methods for fluid around the lungs
Part of Lungs & breathing clinical trials.
This trial compares two ways to drain fluid that has built up around the lungs (pleural effusion) when it is not caused by injury. One method uses a thin, flexible tube (pigtail catheter), and the other uses a larger chest tube. The goal is to see which method works better and is more comfortable for patients.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are older than 18 years.
- You have fluid around your lungs that is not caused by injury or a medical procedure, and it needs to be drained.
- The fluid is in a pocket that can still be drained safely, as shown by a special ultrasound sign (color doppler).
- You do not have a bleeding disorder (INR 1.5 or lower, platelet count 50,000 or higher).
- You are able and willing to give written consent.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial tests a better way to drain fluid from around the lung while you are in the emergency department. It can help you breathe easier and find out what is causing the fluid buildup.
This study tests whether a thin, flexible tube (like a small camera) can safely and effectively help doctors get tissue samples from fluid around the lung. It compares a single-use flexible tool to a standard semi-rigid scope, and may help find the cause of your lung fluid.
This trial tests whether a new method called 'air entrainment' (adding air during drainage) works better than standard drainage for people with a lung that doesn't fully expand. If you have persistent fluid buildup around the lung and are scheduled for drainage, you may be able to join.
This trial looks at how a breathing control system (called neural respiratory drive) changes when doctors remove lung lining fluid using a thoracocentesis, chest drain, or an indwelling pleural catheter. It may help improve how safe breathing measurements are taken during these common procedures.
This trial compares two sizes of chest tubes (16F and 24F) placed after minimally invasive lung cancer surgery. The goal is to see which size leads to better recovery and less pain, while still draining fluid and air effectively.
This study collects information from patients with fluid buildup around the lungs (called pleural effusion) to better understand causes and outcomes. It may help improve care for future patients.
Hear when a new Pleural Effusion trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.