Clin2
NCT06273683Likely a fitRecruiting

Comparing two tubal removal methods during C-section

Permanent SterilizationPregnancy Related

Part of Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of removing the fallopian tubes (salpingectomy) during a planned C-section for permanent birth control. You and your baby will get the same standard care, and the study helps find which technique works best.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
900 people
Ages
21 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You are having a planned C-section and want permanent sterilization (getting your tubes tied) at the same time.
  • You are at least 24 weeks pregnant.
  • You are 21 years old or older.
  • If you have Medicaid, you have signed the Virginia sterilization consent form.
  • You have not had surgery on your fallopian tubes or ovaries before.
  • You do not have placenta accreta, placenta previa, or a bleeding disorder.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06312124Recruiting
Fallopian tube removal to prevent ovarian cancer

This study looks at removing fallopian tubes during other planned surgeries to help prevent ovarian cancer. You may be able to join if you are at least 45 years old, are female or assigned female at birth, and are having non-gynecologic surgery (like gallbladder or hernia repair).

Baltimore, Maryland
NCT06434233Recruiting· Phase 4
Opioid use after fallopian tube removal surgery

This study looks at how much opioid pain medicine people need after having their fallopian tubes removed through small incisions (laparoscopic or robotic salpingectomy). It aims to see if the usual pain medicine can be reduced to decrease opioid use.

Baltimore, Maryland
NCT07379411Recruiting
Energy devices vs. cold scalpel for tube and ovary removal during vaginal hysterectomy

This trial is comparing two ways to remove the fallopian tubes and ovaries during a vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: one using energy-based devices (like a cauterizing tool) and the other using a standard cold scalpel method. It will help determine if the energy-based approach offers any benefits, such as less blood loss or faster recovery.

Holon
NCT07496814Not yet recruiting
Comparing two hysterectomy methods for non-cancer conditions

This study compares two ways to remove the uterus (hysterectomy) for non-cancerous conditions: one using small cuts and a camera (laparoscopic), and the other using a larger belly cut (abdominal). It aims to see which method works better in settings with limited resources.

NCT07199621Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to cut the womb in planned C-sections

This study compares two ways of making the uterine incision (the cut into the womb) during a planned C-section: one using special scissors and the other using a scalpel (a surgical knife). The goal is to see which method is safer or better for you and your baby.

NCT07601971Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to remove the uterus by keyhole surgery

This trial compares two keyhole (laparoscopic) surgeries for removing the uterus in women with non-cancerous conditions like fibroids or heavy bleeding. One method blocks the blood supply to the uterus first, which may reduce bleeding during surgery.

Hear when a new Pregnancy Related trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.