Clin2
NCT06293521Possibly a fitRecruiting

Nerve treatment options for deep cavities in baby teeth

Deep Caries

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to treat severe cavities in baby teeth: removing only the infected part of the nerve (pulpotomy) versus removing all the nerve tissue (pulpectomy). It looks at which method helps the tooth heal better and stay healthy longer.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
40 people
Ages
4 years to 6 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • Your child should be 4 to 6 years old and in good overall health.
  • The tooth must have a deep cavity that causes pain on its own and bleeds from the nerve when cleaned – bleeding lasts more than 5 minutes.
  • The tooth must be fixable (restorable) with a filling or crown.
  • There cannot be any signs of infection like swelling, tenderness, or loose tooth, and no signs of damage on the tooth's roots on an X-ray.
  • The tooth must not have had any previous treatment (like a filling or nerve treatment).
  • You must be able to come back for follow-up visits as needed.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06378814Not yet recruiting
Comparing two cavity removal methods for deep tooth decay

This study compares two ways of removing deep cavities in permanent back teeth to see which one keeps the tooth healthier. If you have a deep cavity that isn't causing constant pain, this trial may help preserve your natural tooth.

NCT06751316Not yet recruiting
Comparing partial nerve removal to full nerve removal for painful baby molars

This study compares two ways to treat severe tooth pain in baby molars: one removes only the damaged part of the nerve, and the other removes the entire nerve (standard treatment). The goal is to see if the less invasive method works as well.

Cairo
NCT07437794Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for baby tooth nerve pain

This study tests two materials used to treat decayed baby molars by removing the nerve and filling the tooth. It aims to see which material works better to keep the tooth healthy and pain-free.

Giza, Giza Governorate
NCT06871709Not yet recruiting
Comparing two materials for preserving nerves in baby molars

This study compares two materials used to treat deep decay in baby molars by preserving the nerve inside the tooth. The goal is to see which material works better and helps the tooth heal without pain or infection.

Cairo
NCT06809478Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for nerve pain in baby back teeth

This study compares two treatments for deep cavities in baby molars that affect the tooth's nerve. It tests whether a natural material (chitosan) works as well as a standard one (formocresol) to save the tooth and avoid early loss.

Cairo
NCT06922578Not yet recruiting
Two ways to treat deep decay in baby molars

This study compares two ways to treat severe tooth decay in baby molars that has reached the nerve. One method removes part of the nerve and puts a special material on it; the other removes all the nerve and fills it with a different material. The goal is to see which approach saves the tooth better and relieves pain.

Hear when a new Deep Caries trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.