Comparing two methods for placing dental implants to improve stability
Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Mouth & dental clinical trials.
This study compares two ways of placing dental implants — a new method using special Densah burs to compact the bone, versus the traditional drilling method. It aims to see which approach makes the implant more stable at the start.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are male or female
- You need a dental implant in a jawbone area with different bone quality levels
- You do not have uncontrolled diseases like diabetes or osteoporosis that affect bone healing
- You do not have a large infection, abscess, cyst, or granuloma near the tooth that will be removed
- You are not scheduled to have the tooth removed through a special surgical procedure (transalveolar extraction)
- You are able to have surgery and do not have uncontrolled medical or psychological conditions
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two ways of placing a dental implant right after a tooth is removed. One method ('osseodensification') gently compacts the bone, while the other uses a traditional drilling technique. The study wants to see which method gives better bone support and healing.
This trial compares two ways of preparing the jawbone for dental implants to see which gives better implant stability. It is for people with low bone density in the back of the jaw who have been missing teeth for at least six months.
This trial tests a new drilling method called osseodensification (which makes the bone denser) versus the standard way of drilling for placing a dental implant right after pulling a tooth. It is for people who need a lower back molar removed and want an implant placed immediately.
This study compares two ways of preparing your jawbone for a dental implant: the usual method (conventional drilling) and a newer 'biological drilling' approach. The goal is to see which method leads to better healing and success for the implant.
This trial compares two drilling techniques for placing a dental implant right after removing a lower molar. It aims to see which method gives better initial stability of the implant, which is important for long-term success.
This study compares two techniques to lift the sinus floor and place dental implants at the same time in people with limited bone height. It aims to find which method is more effective and comfortable for patients.
Hear when a new Patient With Low Denisty Bone trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.