Clin2
NCT07586475Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing implant stability with two drilling techniques

Patient With Low Denisty Bone

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of preparing bone for dental implants: a newer method using special burs (densification) versus traditional drilling. It tests which method gives better implant stability and success.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
20 people
Ages
Any age
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You need a dental implant placed in your jaw
  • You have varying bone quality in the implant area
  • No serious diseases affecting bone healing (like uncontrolled diabetes or osteoporosis)
  • No large infections or cysts around the tooth being removed
  • No psychological disorders or uncontrolled medical conditions
  • Able to have tooth extraction and implant surgery

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06989684Not yet recruiting
Dental implant stability with standard vs. densifying drilling

This trial compares two drilling methods for placing dental implants in low-density jawbone. It may help you achieve a more stable implant by using bone densification, a technique that compacts rather than removes bone.

Rohtak, Haryana
NCT06599112Recruiting
Dental implant stability with different bone drilling methods

This study compares three ways of preparing the jawbone for a dental implant in the upper back area. The goal is to see which technique makes the implant most stable right after placement and over time.

Giza
NCT06307691Recruiting
Comparing two implant placement methods after tooth removal

This trial compares two ways of placing a dental implant right after a tooth is removed. One method ('osseodensification') gently compacts the bone, while the other uses a traditional drilling technique. The study wants to see which method gives better bone support and healing.

Cairo
NCT07077915Enrolling by invitation
New drilling method vs. standard for immediate dental implants

This trial tests a new drilling method called osseodensification (which makes the bone denser) versus the standard way of drilling for placing a dental implant right after pulling a tooth. It is for people who need a lower back molar removed and want an implant placed immediately.

Beirut
NCT06590753Recruiting
Comparing two implant methods for lower denture support

This study compares two different ways of placing dental implants to hold a lower denture (overdenture). One method is a newer 'osseodensification' technique that helps make the bone denser around the implant, while the other is the standard drilling approach. The goal is to see which method gives better results for people who need a stable, implant-supported denture.

Cairo
NCT06992557Not yet recruiting
Comparing two drilling methods for jaw implants

This study compares two different drilling methods used during dental implant surgery to see which one is better. If you need a dental implant in your lower jaw (back teeth area) and are in good health, you may be able to join.

Cairo

Hear when a new Patient With Low Denisty Bone trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.