Clin2
NCT06628492Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two 3D-printed guides for dental implants

Partial-edentulism

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two different 3D-printed guides used during dental implant surgery. If you are missing several teeth in your lower jaw, this trial may help your dentist place implants more precisely.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
12 people
Ages
21 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You should have a normal bite (upper and lower teeth meet evenly).
  • You must be missing more than two teeth in your lower jaw, but still have some teeth remaining.
  • You need to be in generally good health, with no uncontrolled medical conditions like diabetes.
  • Your jawbone must have enough bone to support dental implants.
  • You cannot smoke or use tobacco products.
  • You must not have had chemotherapy or radiation therapy recently, or have a weakened immune system.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06819995Recruiting
3D-printed vs milled guides for dental implants

This study compares two types of surgical guides used to place dental implants: one made with a 3D printer and one milled from a solid block. If you're missing one to four teeth and have healthy healed gums and bone, this trial may help determine which guide works best.

Madrid
NCT07760974Recruiting
Comparing two surgical guides for placing front tooth implants

This study compares two types of 3D-printed guides used during dental implant placement in the front of the mouth. The goal is to see if a new guide (SocketFit) is more accurate than the standard one, which could lead to better implant positioning and outcomes.

Tanta, Gharbia Governorate
NCT07577245Not yet recruiting
Robot versus guide for dental implants

This study compares two ways of placing dental implants: one uses a surgical robot, and the other uses a static guide (a template) to help the dentist place the implant. The goal is to see which method is more accurate and effective. This may help you decide which approach could work best for your implant surgery.

Xi’an, Shanxi
NCT07199153Recruiting
3D printed guide for precise front tooth implant placement

This study tests a new 3D printed guide that helps place a dental implant precisely in the front part of your upper jaw. If you have a single missing tooth there and good bone quality, this approach may offer a more accurate and less invasive treatment.

Cairo
NCT07208812Recruiting
3D-printed lower dentures: comparing impression methods

This study compares two ways of making dental impressions for 3D-printed overdentures (removable tooth replacements held by implants). It looks for people who need new lower-jaw implants and are otherwise healthy.

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate
NCT06910007Not yet recruiting
Testing software for guided dental implant placement

This study tests different computer software programs used to plan dental implant surgery. It aims to see which software is most accurate, which could lead to better outcomes for patients needing implants.

Hear when a new Partial Edentulism trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.