Comparing two materials for surgical guides in dental implants
Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.
This study compares two different 3D printing materials used to make surgical guides for placing dental implants. It looks at which material works better for people missing multiple teeth in their lower jaw.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You have a normal bite relationship (Class I) between your upper and lower jaw
- You are missing two or more teeth in the lower jaw and need a fixed bridge or implant
- You have enough space between your upper and lower jaws for the implant
- You are in good physical and mental health to handle implant surgery
- You have enough bone in your jaw to support implants, and your gum tissue is healthy
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two types of surgical guides used to place dental implants: one made with a 3D printer and one milled from a solid block. If you're missing one to four teeth and have healthy healed gums and bone, this trial may help determine which guide works best.
This study compares two types of 3D-printed guides used during dental implant placement in the front of the mouth. The goal is to see if a new guide (SocketFit) is more accurate than the standard one, which could lead to better implant positioning and outcomes.
This trial compares two types of tooth implant materials for replacing a missing lower back tooth. It looks at bone health and biting strength to see which material works better.
This trial is testing a way to use 3D-printed guides to place dental implants more accurately. It may be a good option for people who are missing one or more teeth and have good oral health.
This study compares two methods of placing dental implants: one uses a custom guide to plan the entire surgery, the other uses a guide only for part of the procedure. It aims to see which approach places the implant more accurately, especially for people with challenging jawbone conditions.
This study compares two methods for placing dental implants in the back of your mouth: one using a surgical robot and one using a static (non-moving) guide. Both aim to make implant placement more precise and predictable.
Hear when a new Partial Edentulism trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.