Comparing two surgical guides for placing front tooth implants
Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.
This study compares two types of 3D-printed guides used during dental implant placement in the front of the mouth. The goal is to see if a new guide (SocketFit) is more accurate than the standard one, which could lead to better implant positioning and outcomes.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You must be in good health with no major medical conditions.
- You must be between 18 and 35 years old.
- You must have a tooth in the front that needs to be removed and replaced with an implant.
- You must have sufficient bone and healthy gums at the implant site.
- You must not smoke, be pregnant or nursing, or take certain medications.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two methods for placing dental implants in the upper jaw: dynamic navigation (real-time guidance) versus static navigation (using a surgical guide). It aims to see which technique is more accurate for people missing one tooth between the right and left second premolars.
This study tests a new 3D printed guide that helps place a dental implant precisely in the front part of your upper jaw. If you have a single missing tooth there and good bone quality, this approach may offer a more accurate and less invasive treatment.
This trial tests a computer-assisted guide that helps dentists place dental implants more accurately in the upper front area. It may improve the precision of implant placement and reduce complications.
This study compares two different 3D-printed guides used during dental implant surgery. If you are missing several teeth in your lower jaw, this trial may help your dentist place implants more precisely.
This study compares two types of surgical guides used to place dental implants: one made with a 3D printer and one milled from a solid block. If you're missing one to four teeth and have healthy healed gums and bone, this trial may help determine which guide works best.
This study compares two ways of placing dental implants: one uses a surgical robot, and the other uses a static guide (a template) to help the dentist place the implant. The goal is to see which method is more accurate and effective. This may help you decide which approach could work best for your implant surgery.
Hear when a new Conventional Static Surgical Guide trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.