Clin2
NCT06774560Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

3D printed vs. milled onlays for decayed molars

Badly Decayed Molars

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares two ways of making a type of dental filling called an onlay for back teeth with cavities. One method uses 3D printing and the other uses a computer-guided milling machine. The goal is to see which one works better.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
50 people
Ages
25 years to 45 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 25 and 45 years old.
  • You have one or two back teeth (molars) with cavities that need a partial crown (onlay).
  • You have at least 20 teeth that touch when you bite down.
  • You keep your mouth clean and practice good oral hygiene.
  • You do not have severe gum disease or tooth grinding habits.
  • You are not a heavy smoker, pregnant, or have a medical condition that could interfere with the study.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07378982Not yet recruiting
3D-printed overlays vs. CAD/CAM for damaged back teeth

This trial compares two types of tooth-colored overlays (like advanced fillings) for molars that have had root canals and are badly broken down. The goal is to see which type—3D-printed or computer-designed—works better over 18 months.

Cairo, Cairo Governorate
NCT07195201Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of onlay restorations for back teeth

This trial tests two different types of onlay restorations (like custom fillings) for back teeth that have moderate damage but are still healthy. It is designed for adults with good oral hygiene and no active gum disease or grinding habits.

Mersin, Yenisehir
NCT05943782Enrolling by invitation
Digital onlay fillings made two ways for back teeth

This trial compares two digital manufacturing methods to make ceramic onlay fillings for back (molar) teeth—one method that removes material and one that builds it up. It may help you learn which approach makes more comfortable, effective onlays for teeth needing repair.

Cairo
NCT07667946Not yet recruiting
Comparing two 3D-printed resin overlays for large cavities in back teeth

This study compares how well two different 3D-printed resin fillings (called 'overlays') hold up over 18 months on back teeth that have large cavities or broken fillings. It involves up to 3 visits and aims to find the best way to prepare the tooth for the filling.

NCT07643311Recruiting
Comparing two types of tooth caps for root-canal-treated molars

This study compares two ways to restore (cap) back teeth that have had root-canal treatment and lost a cusp or more. Researchers want to see which method—computer-milled or 3D-printed crowns—works better and lasts longer.

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan
NCT07429747Not yet recruiting
Comparing 3D-printed vs. bulk-filled fillings for large cavities in back teeth

This trial tests two different types of tooth-colored fillings for large cavities in adult back teeth: one made with 3D printing technology and one placed in a single layer. The goal is to see which holds up better over time.

Hear when a new Badly Decayed Molars trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.