Comparing two implant types in knee revision surgery
Part of Bones, joints & muscles clinical trials.
This study compares two types of knee implants (CCK vs PS) used during revision total knee replacement. The goal is to see which one works better in patients who need a second knee surgery.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are between 18 and 80 years old.
- You are having a revision of your total knee replacement that includes replacing the thigh bone (femoral) part, or both the thigh bone and shin bone (tibial) parts.
- At least 6 weeks have passed since your original knee replacement surgery.
- Your reason for revision includes things like loosening, instability, or infection (but not just a simple bearing exchange).
- You do NOT need a hinged implant and your surgeon hasn't already decided you require the more constrained type (CCK).
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two types of knee implants used when a previous knee replacement needs to be revised (re-done). It aims to see which design offers better outcomes for patients needing both parts of the implant replaced.
This study tracks how well a particular knee revision implant performs over many years. It may help you by closely monitoring your knee after revision surgery and adding to long-term safety and performance data.
This study compares two designs of knee replacement implants to see how they affect walking, function, and outcomes after surgery. You may be randomly assigned to one of the implant types used for your specific, approved knee replacement.
This study checks how well a specific knee replacement system works in people who need a revision knee surgery (replacing a previous implant). If you have had or will have this surgery with the EVOLUTION parts, researchers will follow you for 10 years to see how the implant performs.
This study follows people after they get a total knee replacement using the Multigen Plus system, sometimes with special cone pieces. It looks at how well the implant performs over time and whether results meet expectations.
This study compares how a knee implant’s components “fit” and move when placed in two different ways during robotic knee replacement. It uses special imaging to see which placement works best for stability and long-term performance.
Hear when a new Aseptic Loosening of Prosthetic Joint trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.