Clin2
NCT06895915Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing robotic and navigation-guided dental implants for upper front teeth

Tooth Diseases

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two modern techniques for placing a dental implant in the upper front area right after a tooth is removed: a robotic system versus a dynamic navigation system. The goal is to see which method is more accurate, which may help you get a more precise and successful implant placement.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
24 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be at least 18 years old and generally healthy.
  • You need one or more upper front teeth that cannot be saved and need to be removed, but not because of gum disease.
  • The bone behind the tooth must be healthy and strong enough.
  • You should not have an active infection in the area where the tooth will be removed.
  • You should not have a history of gum disease or uncontrolled gum problems.
  • You should not be a heavy smoker or have quit heavy smoking within the last 5 years.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07291336Recruiting· Phase 4
Comparing two ways to place dental implants

This trial compares two methods for placing dental implants in the upper jaw: dynamic navigation (real-time guidance) versus static navigation (using a surgical guide). It aims to see which technique is more accurate for people missing one tooth between the right and left second premolars.

Cairo
NCT06963242Recruiting
Testing a navigation tool for full-arch dental implants

This trial tests whether a dynamic navigation system helps place dental implants more accurately for people who need a full set of upper or lower teeth. If you are missing most or all of your teeth and are generally healthy, this study may be for you.

Ho Chi Minh City
NCT07577245Not yet recruiting
Robot versus guide for dental implants

This study compares two ways of placing dental implants: one uses a surgical robot, and the other uses a static guide (a template) to help the dentist place the implant. The goal is to see which method is more accurate and effective. This may help you decide which approach could work best for your implant surgery.

Xi’an, Shanxi
NCT06086873Recruiting
Comparing two dental implant surfaces for healing

This study compares two types of dental implant surfaces to see which helps the implant bond better with the jawbone after a tooth is pulled. It may help you if you need a single front tooth or first premolar replaced.

London
NCT06764654Recruiting
Comparing two guided surgery methods for back jaw implants

This study compares two types of guided surgery methods for placing dental implants in the back of the jaw (where there are missing teeth). It aims to find which technique works better for patients who need implants in that area.

Alicante, Alicante
NCT07468760Not yet recruiting
Implant timing for front teeth

This trial compares two ways of replacing a front tooth with a dental implant: placing the implant right after the tooth is removed (using the socket-shield technique) versus waiting a few months. It aims to see which approach keeps the gum and bone around the implant looking and feeling better.

Ajman

Hear when a new Tooth Diseases trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.