Comparing two surgical methods for widening the spinal canal
Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Brain & nervous system clinical trials.
This study looks at two different surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, a condition where the spinal cord is compressed in the neck. By comparing them, doctors hope to find a better way to relieve pressure and improve symptoms.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You must be over 18 years old.
- You must have a diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and be a candidate for surgery.
- You need to be in generally good health and able to undergo surgery.
- You have not had previous cervical spine surgery.
- You do not have severe deformities, fractures, infections, tumors, or other serious neck conditions.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two surgery approaches for people with a gradually worsening spinal cord problem in the neck: doing fusion (joining bones together) versus not doing fusion after decompression (making more space for the spinal cord). It aims to see which approach works better and is safer for symptoms and recovery.
This study looks at a more tailored and standardized surgical approach for people with neck spinal narrowing and spinal cord symptoms. It may help doctors compare and improve how well surgery works for different patients.
This study compares two approaches for people with mild cervical myelopathy, a condition where the spinal cord is squeezed in the neck. One group receives conservative (non-surgical) care, and the other receives a surgery called decompression. The goal is to see which approach helps maintain or improve function and quality of life.
This study is comparing two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (narrowing of the lower spine). It aims to see if a less invasive surgery works as well as a more extensive procedure, which may help patients recover faster.
This study compares two types of surgery to relieve pressure on the nerves in your lower back caused by narrowing of the spinal canal. One is a traditional open surgery, and the other is a microsurgery using a microscope for a smaller incision. Both aim to reduce pain and improve function.
This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that puts pressure on nerves). One group will get standard decompression (relieving pressure), the other group will get that plus screws and rods to stabilize the spine. The goal is to see which leads to better outcomes.
Hear when a new Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.