Fusion vs no fusion after neck cord decompression
Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Genetic & congenital clinical trials.
This trial compares two surgery approaches for people with a gradually worsening spinal cord problem in the neck: doing fusion (joining bones together) versus not doing fusion after decompression (making more space for the spinal cord). It aims to see which approach works better and is safer for symptoms and recovery.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are over 18 years old
- You have neck spinal cord compression from wear-and-tear (degenerative myelopathy) affecting the C3 to C7 area, involving 1 to 4 levels
- You have at least one symptom or exam finding showing spinal cord problems (myelopathy)
- You have never had surgery on your neck spine before
- You can understand and read Swedish and agree to follow all study visits and procedures
- You are eligible for both surgery options (fusion or no fusion) and can sign consent
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study looks at two different surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, a condition where the spinal cord is compressed in the neck. By comparing them, doctors hope to find a better way to relieve pressure and improve symptoms.
This trial compares outcomes after decompression surgery for one affected area in the lower back, with and without adding spinal fusion. It may help patients avoid unnecessary extra surgery—or ensure fusion is used when it’s needed.
This study compares two approaches for people with mild cervical myelopathy, a condition where the spinal cord is squeezed in the neck. One group receives conservative (non-surgical) care, and the other receives a surgery called decompression. The goal is to see which approach helps maintain or improve function and quality of life.
This trial tests whether a spinal fusion surgery is better than staying with non-surgical treatments for people with long-term, severe low back pain from worn-out discs in the lower spine. It aims to find out which approach offers better pain relief and quality of life.
This study compares two treatments for people who have narrowing of the spine above a previous back fusion. One option is just removing the pressure on the nerves, and the other is also extending the fusion. It aims to see which works better for symptoms like leg pain or cramping when walking.
This study looks at how well a specific neck surgery (posterior cervical fusion using added spacers) works for people with long-standing, non-traumatic neck wear-and-tear problems. It will track outcomes using symptoms and imaging to see if the surgery improves function and healing.
Hear when a new Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.