Comparing two types of back surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
Part of Bones, joints & muscles clinical trials.
This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that puts pressure on nerves). One group will get standard decompression (relieving pressure), the other group will get that plus screws and rods to stabilize the spine. The goal is to see which leads to better outcomes.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are between 30 and 60 years old
- You have been diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine canal) on an MRI
- You have disc problems at more than one level in your lower back
- You have age-related disc wear and tear (degenerative disc disease) showing on MRI
- You have tried at least 6 weeks of non-surgical treatments (like physical therapy or medication) without enough relief
- You have not had any prior back surgery, and you do not have other spine problems (like cancer, severe slippage, or major curves), or serious health conditions like diabetes or heart disease
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two minimally invasive surgical methods for treating a type of lower back problem where one spinal bone slips forward over another. The goal is to see which approach gives better pain relief and function, helping you choose the best option.
This study is comparing two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (narrowing of the lower spine). It aims to see if a less invasive surgery works as well as a more extensive procedure, which may help patients recover faster.
This study compares two different surgical techniques – one using a small camera (endoscopic discectomy) and the other a traditional open approach (microdiscectomy) – to treat narrowing in the lower spine. It helps find which method may be better for relieving pain and improving function.
This trial compares two slightly different surgical techniques for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal that causes leg pain). Both procedures fuse one level of your spine to relieve pain, but use slightly different approaches through the side of the spine.
This trial compares outcomes after decompression surgery for one affected area in the lower back, with and without adding spinal fusion. It may help patients avoid unnecessary extra surgery—or ensure fusion is used when it’s needed.
This study compares two surgeries to relieve pressure on the spinal nerves in the lower back (lumbar stenosis). Both use small tools, but one uses a tiny camera (endoscopic) and the other uses a microscope, to help improve pain and walking.
Hear when a new Lumbar Spinal Stenosis trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.