Clin2
NCT07308496Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two imaging tests for guiding coronary artery disease treatment

Coronary Artery Disease

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This trial compares two non-invasive imaging tests to help doctors decide whether patients with narrowed heart arteries need stents or surgery. One test uses a CT scan, the other uses a standard angiogram, both measuring blood flow to guide treatment.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
1,402 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have stable angina, unstable angina, or had a heart attack at least 72 hours ago.
  • A CT scan shows at least one artery with 70–90% narrowing (blockage).
  • You have not had previous heart procedures like stents or bypass surgery.
  • You do not have severe kidney disease.
  • You do not have severe heart rhythm problems or other major heart conditions.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07691502Recruiting
Using CT scans before angioplasty to plan treatment

This trial tests if using a special heart CT scan (CCTA with FFRCT) before a planned angioplasty can help doctors better plan where to place stents. You may be eligible if you have a narrowing in one or two heart arteries that haven't been treated before.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
NCT05857904Not yet recruiting
Comparing CT-based blood flow test to standard angiography for chest pain

This study compares a CT-based method to measure blood flow in the heart with the standard invasive test, to see if it can help guide treatment for people with chest pain. It aims to reduce the need for invasive procedures.

Shanghai, Shagnhai
NCT04939207Recruiting
Test safer, cheaper scans for suspected coronary artery disease

This study compares new imaging methods to see how well they work and whether they can lower costs for people with suspected coronary artery disease. It may help by using different scan approaches while keeping patient safety in mind.

Eindhoven, North Brabant
NCT05829889Recruiting
FFR test versus angiogram to guide left main heart treatment

This trial compares two ways to decide how to treat a narrowed “left main” coronary artery: a pressure-based test (FFR) versus standard X-ray imaging (angiography). It aims to see which approach better helps choose safe, appropriate treatment using a stent when appropriate.

Hong Kong
NCT06182683Recruiting
OCT-Guided vs. FFR-Guided Stent Placement in Heart Disease

This trial compares two imaging and pressure tests used during stent placement to see which helps improve blood flow better in people with chest pain or a recent heart attack.

Seoul
NCT06790836Recruiting
CT scan vs. invasive test for heart artery blood flow

This study looks at how well a special CT scan (FFR CT) matches the results of a more invasive wire test (invasive FFR) for measuring blood flow in heart arteries. It may help doctors use CT scans more confidently instead of always needing the invasive procedure.

Birmingham, West Midlands

Hear when a new Coronary artery disease trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.